Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED, J
V. Monimozhi – Appellant
Versus
T. John Britto – Respondent
ORDER :
(SHAMIM AHMED, J.)
This is a petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the Respondent for violation of the order, dated 05.09.2024 passed by the Writ Court in W.P.(MD)No.6759 of 2021.
2. Heard Mr.H.Mohammed Imran, learned counsel and Ms.R.Affrin Fathima, learned counsel for M/s.Ajmal Associates, appearing for the Petitioner and Mr.F.Deepak, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent.
3. When the matter was taken up on 24.04.2025, this Court passed the following order:
“3. In compliance with the order passed by this Court dated 09.04.2025, Mr.T.John Britto, presently serving as the District Educational Office (Elementary), Oddanchatram, Dindigul District is present in person before this Court and has filed an affidavit of compliance.
4. Mr.F.Deepak, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the Respondent submits that proceedings regarding compliance with the orders passed by the Writ Court dated 05.09.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.6759 of 2021 and the Appellate Court dated 14.02.2025 in W.A.(MD)No.289 of 2025, have been initiated and forwarded to the concerned authorities.
5. Upon perusing the compliance affidavit sub
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to comply may lead to contempt proceedings; the respondent must ensure the petitioner receives due benefits.
Court reaffirmed the necessity of compliance with judicial orders, emphasizing that non-compliance can lead to contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Compliance with court orders is mandatory, and failure to adhere can lead to contempt proceedings as ruled in the present case.
Court emphasized the necessity of compliance with judicial orders, ruling that willful disobedience constitutes contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with court orders, once established, mitigates contempt proceedings, reaffirming the importance of procedural respect by public authorities.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to do so may lead to contempt proceedings, as emphasized by the court's directive for timely disbursement of benefits.
Compliance with court orders is essential; non-compliance leads to contempt, but established compliance results in discharge from contempt proceedings.
Non-compliance with court orders constitutes contempt, but fulfillment of directives leads to discharge from contempt proceedings.
Court dismissal of contempt based on compliance with previous orders and procedural rights for further challenges establishes adherence to judicial processes.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to do so may lead to contempt proceedings, which can be dropped upon fulfillment of the order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
