Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED, J
Rajalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
K.Srinivsan – Respondent
ORDER :
Shamim Ahmed, J.
This is a petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the Respondent for violation of the order, dated 30.09.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.17522 of 2022.
2. Heard Mr.S.Sivaprakash, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan, learned Standing Counsel, on behalf of the 1st Respondent and Mr.F.Deepak, learned Special Government Pleader on behalf of the 2nd Respondent.
2. When the matter was taken up on 07.04.2025, this Court passed the following order :
“When the matter was taken up on 03.03.2025, this Court passed the following order:
2. Mr.S.Sivaprakash, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was eligible for appointment as Lecturer (Physics) in Government Polytechnic Colleges (Engineering/Non-Engineering) for the year 2018-2019, as per the notification dated 07.11.2019. However, the respondents failed to appoint the petitioner to the said post without providing any reasons, despite the petitioner meeting the eligibility criteria as per the Teacher Recruitment Board's rules. Aggrieved over the same, the Petitioner has filed a Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.17522 of 2022 and the learned Single Judge of
Court emphasized the necessity of compliance with judicial orders, ruling that willful disobedience constitutes contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with court orders is mandatory, and failure to adhere can lead to contempt proceedings as ruled in the present case.
Compliance with court orders, once established, mitigates contempt proceedings, reaffirming the importance of procedural respect by public authorities.
Court reaffirmed the necessity of compliance with judicial orders, emphasizing that non-compliance can lead to contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to comply may lead to contempt proceedings; the respondent must ensure the petitioner receives due benefits.
Compliance with court orders is essential; non-compliance leads to contempt, but established compliance results in discharge from contempt proceedings.
Court dismissal of contempt based on compliance with previous orders and procedural rights for further challenges establishes adherence to judicial processes.
Non-compliance with court orders constitutes contempt, but fulfillment of directives leads to discharge from contempt proceedings.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to do so may lead to contempt proceedings, as emphasized by the court's directive for timely disbursement of benefits.
Non-compliance with court orders leads to contempt, but full compliance results in dismissal of such proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
