Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Shamim Ahmed, J
Sr. A. Paulia Savariammal, St.Aloysius Girls Higher Secondary School, Velliavilai, Palappallam Post, Kanyakumari – Appellant
Versus
Balathandayuthabani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contempt petition filed for non-compliance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. writ court's previous order details. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondent's non-compliance asserted. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. respondents claim compliance and assurance. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. petitioner received assurance of compliance. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. contempt proceedings concluded; compliance acknowledged. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
This Contempt Petition has been filed with the prayer that the respondents/contemnors have not complied with the judgment and order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.7583 of 2021, dated 02.09.2022.
2. Heard Mr.FR.S.Savarimuthu for M/S.Father Xavier Associates appearing for the petitioner and Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader, for the Respondents.
3. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions, in which, the main writ petition number is W.P.(MD) No.7051 of 2020, vide order dated 02.09.2022, had passed the following order in W.P.(MD) No.7583 of 2021:-
“Accordingly, the impugned order dated 05.02.2021, on the file of the fourth respondent is quashed. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the concerned Educational Authorities to forthwith pass orders, approving the
Court reaffirmed the necessity of compliance with judicial orders, emphasizing that non-compliance can lead to contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Compliance with court orders is essential; non-compliance leads to contempt, but established compliance results in discharge from contempt proceedings.
Court dismissal of contempt based on compliance with previous orders and procedural rights for further challenges establishes adherence to judicial processes.
Compliance with court orders is mandatory, and failure to adhere can lead to contempt proceedings as ruled in the present case.
Non-compliance with court orders constitutes contempt, but fulfillment of directives leads to discharge from contempt proceedings.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to comply may lead to contempt proceedings; the respondent must ensure the petitioner receives due benefits.
Non-compliance with court orders leads to contempt, but full compliance results in dismissal of such proceedings.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and failure to do so may lead to contempt proceedings, as emphasized by the court's directive for timely disbursement of benefits.
Court emphasized the necessity of compliance with judicial orders, ruling that willful disobedience constitutes contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Compliance with court orders, once established, mitigates contempt proceedings, reaffirming the importance of procedural respect by public authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
