SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2511

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K. RAJASEKAR, S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
D. Sasikala – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Ilamvaludhi
For the Respondents: Mrs. E. Ranganayaki Additional Government Pleader, Mr. D.B.R. Prabhu, Standing Counsel.

ORDER :

(S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The writ petition has been filed challenging the Locking and Sealing notice dated 30.01.2024 passed by the third respondent.

2. Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi, the learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly made a submission that the revision petition filed by the petitioner under Section 80 -A of the Town and Country Planning Act was rejected by the Government.

3. Thus, the cause aroused for the purpose of institution of the present writ petition become vanished. There is no impediment for the Authorities to continue the enforcement action by following the procedures as contemplated. The respondents are directed to conclude the enforcement action by following the procedures within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top