SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2516

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K. RAJASEKAR, S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
D.P. Chandramathi – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K. Gajendiran.
For the Respondents: Mrs. E. Ranganayaki, Additional Government Pleader, Mr. RA. Gopinath, Standing Counsel.

ORDER :

(S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The writ of mandamus has been instituted to direct the 4th respondent to give three months time for obtaining planning permission from the 1st respondent for the land and building situated at No.9, Jeevanandham 4th Street, Kumaran Nagar, Avadi, Chennai - 600 054.

2. The relief as such sought for in the present writ petition is not entertainable.

3. In the present case, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Avadi Municipality would submit that the unauthorised constructions / deviations are identified. Lock and Seal notice was issued.

4. Therefore, the petitioner may prefer a revision under Section 80 -A of the Town and Country Planning Act before the Government and the writ petition is not entertainable.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top