Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Latha @ Shree Latha – Appellant
Versus
D. Surendran – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Criminal Revision Case No.756 of 2021 had been filed as against the order dated 23.03.2021 passed in C.R.P. No. 11 of 2018 on the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur modifying the order dated 14.02.2018 made in M.C. No. 30 of 2014 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur, so far as the maintenance awarded to the second Petitioner/minor child alone is concerned.
2. Criminal Original Petition No.8928 of 2021 had been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 23.03.2021 passed in C.R.P. No. 11 of 2018 on the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur modifying the order dated 14.02.2018 made in M.C. No. 30 of 2014 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur, in entirety .
3. The brief facts, which are necessary for the disposal of this Criminal Revision, are as follows:-
3.1. As per the averments in M.C. No. 30 of 2014, the marriage between the first Petitioner and the Respondent was solemnised on 08.12.2008 at Arulmighu Sivanmalai Murugan Kovil, Kangeyam as per Hindu rites and customs followed by a reception held on 09.12.2008 at Saravana Mahal, Tiruppur. It was stated that
The court emphasized that maintenance amounts must match the living standards and financial capabilities of both parties, rejecting the husband's claim of poverty due to his affluent background.
Point of law - As per Section, 125 of Cr.P.C, only minor child is entitled to get maintenance amount. Therefore, regarding second respondent, the revision petitioner need not to pay maintenance amoun....
three children are under the custody of their mother/ petitioner. Since the petitioner is a guardian of their children she has to maintain the education and marriage of the children etc. Further, the....
Point of law: after granting of the decree for restitution of conjugal rights, he has attempted to comply with the said order, but the same was thwarted by the revision petitioner/wife. As rightly co....
: FIXATION OF MONTHLY MAINTENANCE - First respondent as well as the revision petitioner are financially sound- Educational expenses of the respondents 2 and 3, status of the parties and the present e....
The court upheld the Family Court's maintenance order, affirming the husband's legal obligation to support his wife and children despite claims of the wife's financial independence.
A divorced woman not remarried is entitled to maintenance under Section 125, but the amount must reflect her financial independence.
The obligation of a husband to maintain his wife and child is both legal and moral, requiring consideration of the immediate needs of dependents despite financial claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
