SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 2919

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
J. NISHA BANU, S.SRIMATHY, JJ.
The State of Tamil Nadu - Appellant 
Versus 
The Secretary, Fathima College, (Autonomous) - Respondent 
W.A(MD)No.758 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.5170 of 2025
Decided on : 25-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.J.Ashok, Additional Government Pleader
For the Respondents: Ms.A.Amala

Promotions from Laboratory Assistant to Typist and Junior Assistant are valid under statutory rules, irrespective of equal pay, and cannot be denied based on non-statutory circulars.

Headnote:

(A) Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Rules, 1979 - Promotion of Laboratory Assistants to Typist, Junior Assistant, and Storekeeper - Writ petition filed to quash refusal of approval for promotions - Court found that the promotions were valid as per Rule 11(4)(i) and G.O.Ms.No.11, which allows filling posts irrespective of equal pay - The refusal to approve promotions based on a circular lacking statutory force was deemed incorrect. (Paras 8, 14, 17)

(B) Promotion Criteria - The court emphasized that promotions must consider in-house candidates if qualified, regardless of equal pay scales, and that the government’s circular cannot override statutory provisions. (Paras 8, 11, 14)

Facts of the case:
The writ petition was filed by a private aided minority college seeking approval for promotions of five Laboratory Assistants to various posts, which were denied by the Joint Director of Collegiate Education citing lack of promotional avenues. (Paras 2, 4)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the writ petition, confirming that the promotions were valid under applicable rules and government orders, and directed the approval of promotions. (Paras 17, 19)

Issues: The main issues included the validity of promotions from Laboratory Assistant to other posts and the applicability of government circulars versus statutory rules. (Paras 6, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the statutory rules allow for promotions from in-house candidates regardless of equal pay, and that the government circular lacked statutory authority. (Paras 11, 14)

Result: Writ appeal dismissed; approval for promotions directed.

JUDGMENT :

S.SRIMATHY, J.

This Writ Appeal is filed by the respondents in the writ petition challenging the order, dated 26.02.2024, passed in W.P.(MD)No.1482 of 2024.

2. The Writ Petition was filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the order dated 06.11.2023 passed in Oo.Mu.No. 10742/E1/2023 by 3rd respondent and consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to approve forthwith promotions given to Lab Assistants in the petitioner's college viz. S.Mahilprabha as Typist with effect from 01.06.2018, M.Jeyakumar as Typist with effect from 02.07.2018, Sr.S.Stella Arul Mary as Junior Assistant with effect from 01.08.2019, I.Francis Xavier as Junior Assistant with effect from 01.08.2019 and L.Shanthi as Storekeeper with effect from 01.06.2022 with all attendant benefits.

3. The brief facts as stated in the affidavit is that the writ petitioner college namely Fathima College is a private aided minority college governed under the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976 and the Rules framed thereunder. In the year 2018 to 2022 the college promoted five Lab Assistants on various dates to Typist, Junior Assistants and Store Keeper in the sanctioned vacancies. The details are tabulated hereunder:

S. No.Name and designationPromoted post and date of promotionVacancy details
1S.Mahilprabha Laboratory AssistantTypist 01.06.2018Promotion of Typist S.Mary Clarabai as Assistant on 01.06.2018 FN
2M.Jeyakumar Laboratory AssistantTypist 02.07.2018Promotion of Typist K.Sundari as Assistant on 02.07.2018 FN
3Sr.S.Stella Arul Mary Laboratory AssistantJunior Assistant 01.08.2019Retirement of Junior Assistant M.James on 31.07.2019 AN
4I.Francis Xavier Laboratory AssistantJunior Assistant 01.08.2019Retirement of Junior Assistant S.Sieiyamalar Annai Mary on 31.07.2019 AN
5L.Shanthi Laboratory AssistantStorekeeper 01.06.2022Retirement of Storekeeper S.Marypushparani on 31.05.2022 AN

4. After conferring promotions, the college submitted the proposal for approval to the 3rd respondent, Joint Director of Collegiate Education on 23.08.2023 and 28.08.2023 and a reminder through registered post on 29.09.2023. Thereafter the 3rd respondent/ Joint Director, vide proceedings dated 06.11.2023 refused approval stating the Laboratory Assistants cannot be promoted as Typist, Junior Assistants and Store Keeper. Hence the writ petition challenging the order dated 06.11.2023.

5. The Writ Court had considered the rival claims and thereafter followed the Division Bench order passed in W.A.(MD)No.114 and 9 of 2020 and allowed the writ petition. Aggrieved over the same, the respondents in the writ petition had preferred the present writ appeal raising various grounds.

6. After hearing the rival submissions, this Court had given its anxious consideration. It is an admitted facts that Laboratory Assistant, Library Assistant (only one promotion as Librarian) and some other posts are not having any promotional avenue and the said persons would be stagnated in the same post in their entire service.

7. The primary contention of the Learned Additional Government Pleader is that the Laboratory Assistant is not the feeder category to promote to the post of Junior Assistant since both carry same scale of pay. Further submitted that when several requests came from the colleges for such promotion the government had issued clarification in Government Letter No.646/G2/13-1 dated 14.08.2013 wherein it is clarified that the post of Laboratory Assistant and Junior Assistant carries same scale of pay and therefore the Laboratory Assistant post cannot be feeder category for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant. The said contention of the appellants cannot be accepted since the said government letter is only circular and the same is not having any statutory force. Also, it is not acceptable for various reasons which is discussed in the following paragraphs.

8. Under Rule 11(4)(i) of Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Rules (as amended vide G.O.Ms.No.60 of Education d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top