SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 208

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
Jamal K.M., S/o. Late P.M. Muhammed Kunju – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Secretary To Government, Department Of Local Self Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram and Ors. – Respondents
W.P(C). No.21401 Of 2019, W.P(C).NO.3617 OF 2012, W.P(C).NO.17012 OF 2013, W.P(C).NO.16559 OF 2019, W.P(C).NO.16559 OF 2019, W.P(C).NO.23835 OF 2019, W.P(C).NO.27547 OF 2019, W.P(C).NO.29669 OF 2019, W.P(C).NO.34508 OF 2019, W.P(C).NO.4722 OF 2020, W.P(C).NO.29042 OF 2020, W.P(C).NO.28797 OF 2021, W.P(C).NO.30916 OF 2021, W.P(C).NO.16041 OF 2022, W.P(C).NO.18608 OF 2022, W.P(C).NO.33922 OF 2022, W.P.(C).NO.34198 OF 2022, W.P(C).NO.35249 OF 2022, W.P(C).NO.37235 OF 2022, W.P(C).NO.37990 OF 2022, W.P(C).NO.39303 OF 2022, W.P(C).NO.5435 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.7625 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.8530 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.17371 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.20446 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.23704 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.26801 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.38221 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.39987 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.41117 OF 2023, W.P(C).NO.2962 OF 2024, W.P(C).NO.3412 OF 2024, W.P(C).NO.6357 OF 2024, W.P(C).NO.8868 OF 2024, W.P(C).NO.8885 OF 2024, W.P(C).NO.9564 OF 2024, W.P(C).NO.15243 OF 2024.
Decided On : 31-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ, SRI.VARUN C.VIJAY, SMT.ARUNA, SMT.THULASI K. RAJ, SMT.MAITREYI SACHIDANANDA HEGDE.
For the Respondents: SRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY, SC, KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SMT.K.R.DEEPA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.ANIL SIVARAMAN, SRI.THANKAPPAN M K, SRI.SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.), SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN, SRI.M.K.DILEEPAN, SRI.JOHN K.GEORGE, SRI.ANOOP.V. NAIR, SMT.RAJI VINCENT, SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SC, CSML, SRI.DEEPAK T.NEDUNGADAN, SRI.K.D.VINCENT, SRI.A.BALAGOPALAN, AMICUS CURIAE.

The court established that only street vendors with valid certificates and IDs issued by the Municipal Corporation are authorized to operate, emphasizing compliance with the legislative framework for street vending.

Headnote:(A) The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 - The Kerala Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Rules - The Kerala Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending and Licensing) Scheme, 2019 - Regulation of street vending activities within Kochi Municipal Corporation - Legislative regime not effectively implemented since 2019 - Court directed the Municipal Corporation to streamline the Town Vending Committee's functioning and prepare a street vending plan - Monitoring Committee and Jagratha Samithi's established to oversee compliance and regulation - Finalized Street Vending Plan notified by the State Government on June 27, 2024. (Paras 2, 5, 6)

(B) Writ petitions filed by street vendors and resident associations - Court emphasized the need for valid certificates of vending and photo ID cards for authorized street vendors - Directions issued for processing applications for vending certificates in accordance with the Act, Rules, and Scheme. (Paras 4, 6)

(C) The court acknowledged the assistance of Amici Curiae in regulating street vending activities and ensuring compliance with statutory provisions. (Paras 6)

Facts of the case:
The writ petitions addressed the regulation of street vending activities within Kochi Municipal Corporation, highlighting the conflict between licensed vendors and resident associations concerned about unlicensed vendors.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Street Vending Plan had been finalized and directed the Municipal Corporation to ensure compliance with the Act and its provisions.

Issues: The main issues included the effective regulation of street vending activities and the issuance of certificates of vending to authorized vendors.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that only those street vendors with valid certificates and IDs issued by the Corporation are authorized to operate, emphasizing the need for compliance with the legislative framework.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of with directions for future regulation.

JUDGMENT :

(A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.)

This batch of writ petitions concerns the issue of regulation of street vending activities within the limits of the Kochi Municipal Corporation. Writ petitions have been filed both by persons aggrieved by the attempts of the Municipal Corporation to prevent them from carrying on their street vending activities, as also by resident associations aggrieved by the proliferation of unlicensed street vendors carrying on vending activities in their residential areas.

2. The writ petitions have been pending since 2019, primarily on account of the fact that the legislative regime for regulating the activities of street vendors had not been effectively implemented in the State. The legislative regime envisaged is discernible from The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, The Kerala Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Rules and The Kerala Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending and Licensing) Scheme, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”, “The Rules” and “The Scheme” respectively for brevity). The object of the said regime is to protect the rights of urban street vendors and to regulate street vending activities and matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

3. Towards ensuring an effective implementation of the legislative regime within the limits of the Kochi Municipal Corporation it was felt necessary to first streamline the functioning of the Town Vending Committee of the Municipal Corporation so that important functions, such as the preparation of the plan for street vending and identification of existing street vendors and issuance of certificates of vending to them, could be carried out by the said committee. An Amicus Curiae – Dr. K.P. Pradeep - was also appointed to assist the court by monitoring the effective implementation of its orders. It was also realized that an effective regulation of street vending activities, and rehabilitation of those street vendors found operating in areas identified as non-vending zones, can be achieved only after a street vending plan, that identifies vending and non-vending zones, is first prepared by the Municipal Corporation. This Court, therefore, passed various orders in these writ petitions, regulating the street vending activities within the Kochi Municipal Corporation limits till such time as the Street Vending Plan for the Kochi Municipal Corporation was notified by the Government.

4. A brief chronology of the significant orders passed by this Court in the last five years reads as follows:

- Order dated 24.01.2020 : The Divisional Councillors of each division of the Cochin Corporation were asked to identify the street vendors operating within the territorial limits of their respective divisions and to submit a list of such persons before the Town Vending Committee constituted in terms of the Rules within three weeks. The Corporation was also directed to publish, within that time, a summary of the Scheme notified by the State Government, in at least two local newspapers having circulation within the area of the Corporation and further, to ensure that the necessary bye-laws in conformity with the Scheme, as required under Section 37 of the Act, are framed by it within two months. The Assistant Commissioners of Police (Traffic) West and East were directed to consider the areas identified by the Corporation as possible vending zones, and submit their suggestions after conducting a joint inspection of the areas along with the representatives of the Corporation and the Greater Cochin Development Authority (GCDA).

- Order dated 19.02.2020: The court took note of the lists of street vendors, prepared and submitted by each of the Divisional Councillors before the Town Vending Committee, and directed the latter committee to compare the names in the said lists, with the names in the lists earlier prepared by the Corporation, and pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top