SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3267

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.Sounthar, J
B.Nithyanandham – Appellant
Versus
R.Rajguru – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.T.G.Ravichandrran
For the Respondent: Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan

JUDGMENT :

The appeal is filed by the injured/claimant questioning the award of compensation passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, IV Small Causes Court, Chennai in M.C.O.P.No.8770 of 2015, dated 27.01.2022.

2. It is the case of the appellant/claimant that on 06.09.2015 when he was standing in the left hand side of Seni Amman Koil Street near Karumari Amman Nagar Junction in front of Tea Shop, a Car belonging to the 1st respondent insured with the 2nd respondent came in a rash and negligent manner and hit the claimant. As a result of the accident, the claimant sustained grievous injuries. Hence, a claim petition was filed seeking compensation of Rs.9,00,000/- against the respondents.

3. The 1st respondent remained exparte before the Tribunal and the claim was contested by the 2nd respondent-insurance company by denying manner of accident as described in the claim petition. The 2nd respondent- insurance company also raised a point that cheque issued by the 1st respondent for payment of premium was dishonoured and hence, there was no privity of contract between the 2nd respondent and the 1st respondent. Therefore, the 2nd respondent-insurance company sought for exoneration.

4. Be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top