SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3292

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
Udaya Kumar - Appellant
Versus
The State through Deputy Superintendent of Police, All Women Police Station,
Dharapuram, Tiruppur District. Crime No.4/2014 - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 813 of 2018
Decided on : 03-03-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. J. Kingsly Solomon
For the Respondent: Mrs. G.V. Kasthuri Additional Public Prosecutor

Consent obtained under a false promise of marriage is invalid, constituting cheating under Section 417 of IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 417, 506(ii), 294(b), 376 - SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(va) - Criminal appeal against conviction for cheating under false promise of marriage - The Appellant was found guilty of cheating the victim by promising to marry her and then refusing based on caste differences - The court emphasized that consent obtained under a false promise is not valid in law. (Paras 12, 14, 20)

(B) Consent - Definition and implications - Consent given under a misconception of fact does not constitute valid consent in criminal law - The court highlighted that the victim's belief in the promise of marriage was exploited by the Appellant. (Paras 10, 18)

Facts of the case:
The Appellant had sexual intercourse with the victim under the pretext of marriage for two years, but later refused to marry her citing caste differences, leading to a complaint and subsequent conviction. (Paras 2, 5)

Findings of Court:
The conviction under Section 417 was upheld as the Appellant had no intention to marry and exploited the victim's belief. (Paras 14, 21)

Issues: Whether the conviction under Section 417 was justified given the circumstances of the case and the nature of consent. (Para 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that consent obtained through a false promise of marriage is invalid, and the Appellant's actions constituted cheating. (Paras 14, 20)

Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.

JUDGMENT :

This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment dated 03.12.2018 passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur in Spl.S.C.No.29 of 2014.

2. The Prosecution came to be launched against the Appellant by the complainant-PW1, who is also the victim in this case. It is the case of the complainant that during the year 2011, a phone call was received in her brother's mobile phone and when she attended it, the line was disconnected. Therefore, PW1 sent a message as to who he is and why he called the mobile number of her brother. The Appellant replied by stating that he is the friend of the brother of PW1. Thereafter, both of them mutually exchanged messages through the mobile phone number of P.W-1 bearing No. XXXXXXXXXX. Later, the Appellant Accused said that he fell in love with her. In response, the Appellant said to have informed that she belonged to a different caste. However, the Appellant said that he will manage everything. Accordingly, on 30th November 2011, the Appellant called P.W-1 in her mobile number and ascertained that there is none in the house and P.W-1 is alone. Therefore, at about 10.30 am the Appellant came to the house of the Accused and under the pretext of marrying her, had sexual intercourse with her. By adopting this mode, the Appellant had sexual intercourse with the Prosecutrix for two years. However, from the year 2013, the Appellant did not attend the phone calls made by her and also refused to meet her. Ultimately, when the Appellant attended the phone call, he has categorically said that since the Prosecutrix belonged to a lower caste, he could not marry her. When this was informed by the Appellant to her parents, they went to meet the Appellant Accused, but he was not in his house. On 01.07.2014, the Appellant Accused came to the house of PW1 and categorically asserted that PW1 belongs to Sakkiliya community and therefore, he could not marry her and also abused PW1 and her family members. The quarrel between the Appellant, PW1 and her family was witnessed by the neighbours. It is in this context, on 02.07.2014, PW1 has given a complaint against the Appellant based on which the case in Crime No. 4 of 2014 was registered on 02.07.2014 for the offences under Sections 417 , 506 (ii) of IPC read with 3 (1) (w) (i) and 3 (2) (va) of The SC/ST, Prevention of Atrocities Act. Ex.P7 is the First Information Report.

3. On receipt of Ex.P-7, P.W-13, Inspector of Police took up the investigation in this case and proceeded to the house of PW1 at about 8 am on 03.07.2014. She drew a rough sketch and observation mahazar, Ex.P-9 in the presence of witnesses Raman and Ashok. She also enquired P.W-1, P.W-2, P.W-3, P.W-4, Shalini-P.W-5, Palanisamy-P.W-6 and Murugan and recorded their statement. Thereafter, she proceeded to Moolanur Bus Stand upon intimation that the Appellant- Accused is waiting to board a bus and arrested him. After arrest, the Appellant was sent to judicial custody for remand. P.W- 13 also taken steps to subject the Prosecutrix to medical examination besides collected the community certificate of P.W-1 as well as the Accused from Pws 10 and 11. On 05.07.2014, both the Prosecutrix as well as the Appellant were subjected to medical examination and she has also recorded the statement of Doctor Ravi and Doctor Divya. P.W-13 also submitted an alteration report to the Court under Ex.P10 as per which the offences for which the case was registered under Ex.P-7 from Section 417 , 506 (ii) of IPC and 3 (1) (w) (i), 3 (2) (va) of SC/ST POA Act was altered into one under Section 376, 417 , 294 (b) , 506 (ii) of IPC and Section 3 (1) (w) (i), 3 (2) (va) of SC/ST (PoA) Act. After concluding her investigation, on 30.07.2014, P.W-13 filed the charge sheet in this case against the Appellant in this case before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dharapuram. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Dharapuram had taken cognizance of the offences under Sections 376, 417 , 294(b) , 506(ii)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top