Ramasamy vs Palaniammal - 2025 Supreme(Mad) 3515

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3515

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J
Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
Palaniammal – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. P. Rajendran
For the Respondent: Mr. B.N. Chandra Shekhar

Table of Content
1. plaintiffs claim joint ownership (Para 2 , 3)
2. kuppu udayar's family background (Para 4)
3. defendants assert release deed validity (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. plaintiffs challenge release deed (Para 8)
5. trial court framed issues (Para 9)
6. evidence presented by parties (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
7. appeal outcome (Para 26)

JUDGMENT :

Aggrieved over the preliminary decree dividing the suit property into two equal shares by metes and bounds and allotting the plaintiffs and 4^th defendant together one such share, the present appeal came to be filed.

3. The case of the plaintiffs is that one Kuppu Udayar had two wives, namely, Thangayammal and Ramayee. Thangayammal had a daughter by name Valliammal, who died leaving behind plaintiffs 1 to 3 as surviving legal heirs. Ramayee, the other wife of Kuppu Udayar had one son called Ramasamy, who is the 1^st Defendant. The defendants 2 and 3 are the son and daughter of the 1^st defendant respectively.

5. In the written statement, while admitting the relationship, it is stated that Kuppu Udayar died on 30.12.1983, leaving behind the 1^st defendant and his sister Valliammal. It is the s