SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 467

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, R.SAKTHIVEL
R. Damodaran – Appellant
Versus
R. Dorairaj (Deceased) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Viveganandhan
For the Respondents: S. Geetha, Rajnish Pathiyil

JUDGMENT :

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

1. Challenging the judgment and decree passed by the learned I Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in O.S.No.6533 of 2019, dated 28.04.2025, granting preliminary decree of 2/3rd share to the plaintiffs, the unsuccessful defendant has filed the above Appeal.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.

3. The 1st plaintiff and the defendant are brothers. They are the sons of one Ranganatha Mudaliar. The suit properties were originally owned by the said Ranganatha Mudaliar. The said Ranganatha Mudaliar died intestate on 04.04.1979 leaving behind his (i) wife Swarnabai Ammal, (ii) the plaintiff and (iii) Miss.R.Vatsala Kumari, his daughter who remained spinster during her lifetime and (iv) the defendant as legal heirs. The 1st plaintiff’s mother Swarnabai Ammal died intestate on 08.01.1993. After the death of the 1st plaintiff’s father and mother, the 1st plaintiff, the defendant and their sister Vatsala Kumari became entitled to 1/3rd share in the properties of their father. The 1st plaintiff was living in the First Floor in the house while, the sister Vatsala Kumari was residing in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top