Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi, J
Thirumathi Narayani Special Officer, Kollangudi Kaliamman Temple – Appellant
Versus
R.P.Balanamasivayam, S/o.Balakrishnan – Respondent
ORDER
The Special Officer / Fit Person of Sri Kumarakadavul @ Subramaniasamy temple and Karuppapillai madam, Valanadu village, Muthukulathur taluk / respondent No.4 in WP(MD)No.29210 of 2023 has filed this application to recall the order passed by this Court in WP(MD)No.29210 of 2023 dated 14.12.2023.
2.The said writ petition was filed by the 1st respondent herein claiming that he is the Trustee / descendant of one Karuppapillai, who established the temple and his samadhi, which is situated in the temple. He was appointed as a hereditary trustee of the temple by the Assistant Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Ramanathapuram district by his order dated 24.07.2008. However he was removed as a hereditary trustee by the Assistant Commissioner by order dated 24.04.2015. As against which, he already filed a writ petition before this Court in WP(MD)no.14220 of 2015 and on the directions of this Court, he is pursuing a suit before the Sub Court, Muthukulathur in OS.No.34 of 2018.
3.The Joint Commissioner, HR and CE Department has appointed this petitioner / 4th respondent in the writ petition as a Special Officer / Fit Person to administer Sri Subramaniasamy temple and the madam attached to
The court modified a restraining order on temple construction, emphasizing the need for timely resolution of ongoing litigation while allowing construction under specific conditions.
The court held that hereditary rights to temple administration supersede unilateral executive appointments when trusteeship disputes are pending, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements and p....
The court upheld the appointment of a fit person for temple administration under Section 49 of the H.R.&C.E. Act, emphasizing the need for substantiated claims regarding trusteeship amid ongoing disp....
The court upheld the appointment of a fit person for temple administration, emphasizing that prior claims by the petitioner were withdrawn, negating his right to contest the appointment without a hea....
The court upheld the recognized rights of a religious community to perform rituals in a temple and deemed the ongoing civil proceedings as sufficient to adjudicate any disputes regarding those rights....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
