IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. RAJASEKAR, JJ.
P. Kavitha D/o Late S.R. Padmanabhan - Appellant
Versus
Secretary to the Government Housing and Urban Development Department, Chennai - Respondent
W.P. No. 37221 of 2024, W.M.P. No. 40233 of 2024
Decided On : 14-02-2025
ORDER :
1. Under assail is the proceedings dated 18.11.2024 issued by the Executive Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation to execute enforcement action, specifically locking and sealing the premises belonging to the petitioner, as per the orders of the Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation dated 11.06.2024 on 29.11.2024. Accordingly, the petitioner was directed to de-occupy the premises within seven days to enable the Greater Chennai Corporation officials to take appropriate action in accordance with law.
2. The petitioner states that she is the absolute owner of the property measuring to an extent of 2420 Sq.ft at Plot No.10, Thangam Colony 1st Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. Admittedly, the petitioner constructed a two-storey building by obtaining building plan permission from Chennai Corporation. However, the Corporation Authorities received complaints from the adjacent plot owner regarding unauthorised building construction/deviations. The complaint was taken on file by the Corporation and an inspection was conducted. The authorities found the following deviations/violations to the approved plans:
| S. No. | Description | As per Plan | As on Site | Deviated/ Unauthorised |
| 1. | Ground Floor & Car Parking | 136.73 | 181.42 | 44.69 m2 |
| 2. | First Floor | 141.83 | 181.42 | 39.59 m2 |
| 3. | Second Floor | 99.89 | 181.42 | 81.53 m2 |
| 4. | Terrace Floor | 9.00 | 14.22 | 5.22 m2 |
3. Consequently, a Stop Work Notice was issued by the Chennai Corporation vide proceedings dated 11.11.2020. Thereafter, further notice was issued on 08.01.2021, which was challenged by the petitioner in W.P.No.476 of 2022. The writ petition was filed and following orders are passed:
“7. Considering the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition and the submissions of the learned counsels appearing on either side, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, directs the first respondent to dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner dated 24.12.2021 on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, within a period of six months. Till such time, the respondents shall not take any coercive action.”
4. The writ petition in W.P.No.14102 of 2021 filed by the Mr. D. Rajasekaran, was also disposed of by this Court on 21.01.2022 granting liberty to move a fresh writ petition as and when required. The Revision filed by the petitioner under Section 80A of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, was disposed of by the Government vide letter dated 08.04.2022. Pertinently, the Government, while disposing of the Statutory Revision, granted three months time to the petitioner to rectify the violations of the subject building and to submit the revised planning permission to Greater Chennai Corporation. The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation is directed to pursue necessary action accordingly and send a report to the Government within a period of three months. However, the petitioner has not complied with the directions issued by the Government. A petition was moved before the Government seeking six months extension of time to carry out rectification works on the subject property.
5. The petitioner filed a writ petition in W.P.No.20044 of 2022, seeking a direction to take action against the alleged illegal construction by her neighbour, Mr.D.Rajasekaran, at Plot No.11 North Crescent Road, 1st Street, H Block, Thangam Colony. The writ petition along with contempt petition in CONT.P.No.405 of 2022, was disposed by the Division Bench of this Court on 27.09.2022 and the following orders are passed:
“5. We are informed that the Commissioner appointed to find out the actual encrochament has, after inspecting the property, filed a report stating that both the petitioners herein and the fourth respondent had encroached upon each other-s property. The dispute which commenced as unauthorised construction has now become a dispute interse between the petitioner and the fourth respondent which has to be decided only by a Competent Civil Court and this Court sitting
Unauthorized constructions must be rectified in compliance with building regulations; courts should not condone illegalities that threaten public safety.
Unauthorized constructions violating approved plans must be demolished; regularization is not an absolute right and must consider public interest and safety.
The court affirmed that any citizen can file complaints regarding unauthorized constructions, emphasizing strict enforcement of planning laws to prevent illegal activities.
Unauthorized constructions cannot be legitimized without proper proof, and courts are mandated to enforce compliance strictly with planning laws.
Adherence to planning regulations is crucial, and unauthorized constructions can be legally demolished by authorities, following proper procedures and relevant statutes.
Strict enforcement of building regulations, removal of illegal constructions, and the duty of planning bodies to ensure compliance with building regulations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.