IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
M/s NLC Tamilnadu Power Limited, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer - Petitioner
Versus
The Tamilnadu Min Uzhiyar Mathiya Amaippu, Represented by its Secretary and Anr. – Respondents
W.P. No.12039 of 2021 and W.M.P. No.12809 of 2021
Decided On : 04-03-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the impugned award. (Para 1) |
| 2. management's perspective on wage parity. (Para 2) |
| 3. workmen's claims and supporting arguments. (Para 3) |
| 4. submissions from both parties. (Para 4) |
| 5. core questions posed for consideration. (Para 5) |
| 6. trade union's maintainability. (Para 6) |
| 7. presence of contractors as necessary parties. (Para 7) |
| 8. authority's powers under relevant rules. (Para 8) |
| 9. principles of natural justice in the inquiry. (Para 9) |
| 10. appropriateness of benefits granted based on comparison. (Para 10) |
| 11. court's dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 11) |
ORDER :
(D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.)
A.The Writ Petition:
This writ petition challenges the impugned award issued by the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), who is the authority under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), on 30.04.2021. It seeks to quash the award concerning the directions provided in paragraph No. 12 (ii) to (vii) and to assert that the consequent findings in the award are illegal, contrary, and in complete derogation of the provisions of the Act and the rules established thereunder, and for further orders. In the challenged award, the 2nd respondent considered the application of the 1st respondent – Union as per rule 25 (2) (v)(a) of the Contract Labour (Central) Rules, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Central Rules'). After conducting an inquiry and evaluating the cases of both parties, it granted the following reliefs in paragraph No. 12, which is extracted hereunder:
“ORDER
(i). The Claim of the Claimant Union for the payment of same and similar wages under the provision of Rule 25(2)(v)(a)&(b) is DISMISSED.
(ii). However, all contract workers employed in the "Coal Handling System" of the Establishment of the Respondent shall be paid the Minimum wages being paid to the contract workers who handle coal anywhere in India, as ordered by the Coal India Ltd., and also being paid by NLCIL in it's Coal Unit at Talabira, Odhisha. Such wages of the High Power Committee is to be paid with effect from 01-06-2021 and also at the rates as and when revised by the Coal India Ltd., This Minimum wage shall consist of Basic, VDA etc., as being paid in Coal India Ltd.,
(iii). All contract workers employed in the "other Divisions" of the Establishment of the Respondent shall be entitled for the "Settlement wages" as being paid to the contract workers employed in the NLC Thermal Power Station at Neyveli Campus.
(iv). From the very first day of employment, all contract workers employed in the Establishment of the Respondent shall also be entitled for the Group Insurance Coverage on par with the contract workers employed in the NLC Thermal Power Station at Neyveli campus.
(v). The rate of wages in the tender documents shall be provided accordingly to enable the contractor concerned to smoothly pass such minimum benefits to the eligible workers.
(vi). The Chief Executive Officer of the Respondent should be informed of and satisfied before stopping any contract worker from employment in order to guard against such frequent complaints of change of contract workers with a view to extract money. Also the particulars such as name, designation, date of joining, date of cessation, division, reason(s) for stoppage etc., need to be entered by the Head of the HR Department in a prescribed Register and the same should be initialed by the said C.E.O and also made available to the Officers of this Authority whenever demanded.
(vii). The above Order shall come into effect from 1.6.2021.”
Aggrieved by the same, the Management has filed the present Writ Petition.
B.Case of the Management:
2. The case of the Management is that on 10.05.2019, the trade union submitted a petition to the Management demanding wage parity for contract workers, based on the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.A.No.213 of 2013 dated 26.10.2016. Subsequently, on 20.05.2019, the trade union submitted a similar petition to the

Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Board and Another Vs. Uttar Pradesh Vidyut Mazdoor Sangh
Steel Authority of India Limited and Another Vs. Jaggu and Others
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Vs. Mahendra Prasad Jakhmola and Others
M/s Gammon India Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Bhilwara Dudgh Utpadak Sahakari Samiti Limited vs. Vinod Kumar Sharma dead by Los and others
The authority rightly ensured wage parity for contract workers under comparable conditions; contract labourers deserve equal pay for similar work, reflecting principles of fair treatment.
The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner has jurisdiction to determine wage parity for contract workers performing similar work as regular employees under Rule 25(2)(v)(a) of the CL (R & A) Central Rules....
Point of law: Labour Law – arrears of pay – Court need not advert to the submissions made on behalf of the management as the same would tantamount to adjudication of the controversy on merits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the statutory right conferred by Rule 25(2)(v)(a) of the 1971 Rules, which guarantees parity in wages and benefits to contract labours engaged with....
The Industrial Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by declaring a contract as sham without a prohibition notification under Section 10 of the CLRA Act, which is necessary for such a determination.
it is difficult to extend minimum time scale to the petitioners as they were not engaged by respondent Nos. 4 to 11 either on contract basis or outsourcing basis.
A judgment contrary to the evidence or without evidence is perverse. Concession of counsel on such facts and law does not bind the party.Master-servant relationship.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.