Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR
K.Arjunraj – Appellant
Versus
K. Dharmaraj (Since deceased) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to delay condonation order (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. settlement agreement reached among parties (Para 6) |
ORDER :
This civil revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 23.04.2024 passed by the learned District Judge, The Nilgiris District at Udhagamandalam, dismissing the application in I.A.No.02 of 2024 filed by the defendants 1, 3 and 4 in the suit, under Order XLI and Rules (3) and (4) of CPC r/w Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT , seeking to condone the delay of 2886 days in filing the appeal against the judgement and preliminary decree dated 18.08.2015 made in O.S.No.107 of 2014 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge at Udhagamandalam.
2. The respondents 5 and 6 herein are the plaintiffs 2 & 3; the respondents 7 to 9 are the legal heirs of the deceased 1st plaintiff - Papathy; the revision petitioners herein are defendants 1, 3 and 4; the respondents 1 to 4 herein are the legal heirs of the deceased 2nd defendant - K.Dharmaraj in the suit.
3. The array of parties in the delay condonation petition in I.A.No.02 of 2024 in A.S. CFR No.4028 of 2023 on the file of the learned District Judge, Udhagamandalamm, The Nilgiris District, is furni
The court upheld the significance of promoting settlements in family disputes, allowing restoration of partition proceedings following a mutual agreement between parties, despite initially excessive ....
A court decree founded on a fraudulent compromise lacks validity and is liable to be set aside, emphasizing adherence to Order XXIII, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC should be allowed only if it is necessary to determine the real issue in controve....
A consent decree is binding on all parties, including those who are ex-parte. An appeal must be filed within the limitation period starting from the date of decree, not later.
When they are not shown to be in any manner perverse, illogical and irrational, resultantly, the substantial questions of law formulated are accordingly answered infavour of the plaintiff and against....
The need for valid reasons for delay in condonation petitions and the lack of bona fides in explanations for delay influenced the court's decision.
(1) Daughter has been recognised and treated as a coparcener by birth with equal rights and liabilities as of that of a son – It is not necessary that a coparcener whose daughter is conferred with ri....
Point of law – Condonation of delay - Appellant had been served and had knowledge of the filing of the suit, but she voluntarily chose not to enter appearance. Since the appellant failed to appear, s....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
