BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.R. SWAMINATHAN, R. POORNIMA, JJ.
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department and Anr. – Appellants
Versus
S. Ramachandran - Respondent
W.A.(MD) No.6 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD) Nos.132 and 11441 of 2023
Decided On : 28-01-2025
JUDGMENT :
(G.R. Swaminathan, J.)
Heard the learned Additional Advocate General assisted by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the appellants and the learned senior counsel assisted by the learned counsel for the respondent / writ petitioner.
2.The respondent / Ramachandran who is working as Health Inspector Grade I complained that his junior / Mohamed Ameen who is working as Health Inspector Grade I is getting more pay and that therefore, his pay should be stepped up. The respondent herein submitted representations dated 15.04.2015 and 23.09.2019. Since they were not considered, he filed W.P.(MD)No.21767 of 2019. The writ petition was disposed of on 16.10.2019 in the following terms:-
“3.According to the petitioner, one Leprosy Inspector / Health Inspector Grade I-B, by name, Mohammed Ameen, working under the second respondent, bearing seniority No. 4191, as per the revised seniority list published by the second respondent, was getting his pay of Rs.7100/- with effect from 01.09.1998 under the Special Grade Health Inspector Grade-I pay of Rs.5900-200-9900, vide proceedings of the Deputy Director of Medical (Leprosy) Tirunelveli, dated 24.11.2014. The petitioner's seniority number in the list is 2181 and he is the senior to the said Mohammed Ameen. His junior is getting higher pay and arrears of increased allowances. Therefore, the petitioner has sent representations dated 15.04.2015 and 23.09.2019 to refix his scale of pay on par with his juniors, who were working as Leprosy Inspectors and to redesignate as Health Inspector Grade-I. However, till date, no order has been passed thereon. Hence, the petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition.
4.Considering the nature of relief sought for by the petitioner, without deciding the issues on merits and the delay in sending the representations, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 15.04.2015 and 23.09.2019 on merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”
3.Pursuant to the direction given by this Court, the Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, DMS Campus, Teynampet, Chennai - 6 vide order dated 30.01.2020 rejected the petitioner's request for stepping up pay. Questioning the same, the respondent filed W.P.(MD)No.6692 of 2020. The said writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 29.06.2022 in the following terms:-
“4.In G.O.(D).No.917, Health and Family Welfare (L1) Department, dated 11.09.2014, Rule 10(b) of the Tamil Nadu Public Health Subordinate Service Rules came to be amended, whereby the scale of pay for the Leprosy Inspector was revised at Rs.4500-7000. Thus, when the post of Health Inspector Grade I B was redesignated as Health Inspector Grade I, both the petitioners, as well as his junior viz., Mr.Mohammed Ameen were brought under the same scale of pay at Rs.4500-125-7000.
5.Admittedly, the petitioner is senior to Mohammed Ameen. Thus, there appears to be a parity in the pay scale with effect from 1997, whereby his junior was drawing a higher scale than the petitioner herein. By applying Rule 22B Rulings (2) of the Fundamental Rules of the Tamil Nadu Government, it can be said that since the re-designation of the post from Health Inspector Grade I B to Health Inspector Grade-I, both the petitioner as well as his junior would be deemed to be in the same cadre and in the same post from 01.08.1997 onwards.
6.The respondents seems to have misconstrued the facts and have made an attempt to compare the earlier cadre held by both the petitioner and his junior. What requires to be considered here is, after the integration of Health Inspector Grade I B as Health Inspector Grade -I, which post the petitioner was also holding at that point of time, there cannot be any parity in the pay scale between the senior and junior, since both were holding the post of Health Inspector Grade-
The court ruled that the pay parity rule does not apply when the senior and junior are not in the same lower post, thus rejecting the claim for stepping up pay.
The court established that the petitioner cannot claim stepping up of pay under Fundamental Rule 27(2) due to the anomaly in pay arising from the junior being promoted to a different post and thereaf....
The court emphasized the importance of maintaining equivalency and analogousness in pay scales for similar positions as per the decision of the Executive Council.
Court upheld the order on promotion and reversion based on combined seniority, abstracting entitlement to benefits.
Entitlement of a senior employee to stepping up of pay equal to that of a junior employee, conditions for stepping up of pay, and the applicability of various judgments related to equal pay for equal....
The principle that a senior employee cannot receive less pay than a junior is upheld, prompting the court to direct equal pay adjustments based on established seniority and promotion timelines.
The principle of stepping up pay must be applied when seniors in the same cadre are receiving lower salaries than their juniors, ensuring equitable pay that adheres to constitutional mandates.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner, as a diploma holder, to the grade of Rs.5700-10100 retrospectively from the date of his initial appointment, emp....
Merger of Section Officer and AAO pay scales w.e.f. 01.01.2006 entitles seniors promoted pre-date to minimum of merged scale for 6th CPC fixation at Rs.13,950 + GP 4800, overriding prior pay differen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.