Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, M.JOTHIRAMAN
Deepa – Appellant
Versus
S.Vijayalakshmi – Respondent
What is the nature of Section 46(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the arrest of women? What are the implications of non-compliance with Section 46(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code? How to determine the maintainability of writ appeals in cases originating from criminal jurisdiction?
Key Points: - The statutory provision barring the arrest of women after sunset without a Magistrate's permission is directory, not mandatory [judgement_subject]. - Arrests of women after sunset and before sunrise without prior Magistrate's permission are illegal due to non-compliance with Section 46(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code (!) (!) . - Writ appeals are maintainable even if the original order stemmed from criminal jurisdiction, provided the relief sought and consequences of the order do not fall within the realm of criminal jurisdiction, such as seeking compensation (!) . - Section 46(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, while a beneficial provision for women's safety, is not mandatory, and substantial compliance may be sufficient (!) (!) . - The absence of explicitly stated consequences for non-compliance with Section 46(4) suggests it is directory, especially when invalidating acts could cause prejudice to those with no control over the duty's performance (!) . - Mechanical adherence to procedures like obtaining prior permission for arrest can injure public interest and cause practical difficulties for the investigating agency (!) . - While Section 46(4) is directory, police officers must still offer explanations for non-compliance, as the provision serves as a caution (!) . - The appeals filed by the Inspector of Police and the Head Constable were allowed, setting aside the single judge's adverse directions against them (!) . - The appeal filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police was dismissed due to inconsistent statements and a lack of fair disclosure of facts regarding the arrest (!) . - The court directed the Police Department to issue further guidelines clarifying what constitutes exceptional situations for arresting women after sunset (!) (!) .
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arrests must comply with established legal protocols regarding women. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. framework for determining maintainability of appeals in criminal jurisdiction cases. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. understanding the nature of section 46(4) and its implications on police conduct. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19) |
| 4. rationalizing the scope and limitations in arrest protocols for women. (Para 18 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
G.R. SWAMINATHAN, J.
These Writ Appeals are directed against the order dated18.10.2019 allowing W.P(MD)No.5508 of 2019 filed by the first respondent herein (S.Vijayalakshmi).
2. The averments set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition can be summarized as follows:
The writ petitioner's husband/Saravanan is engaged in the business of selling tyres. His premises are located in D.No.31/1, Workshop Road, Madurai–1. His brother Madhu Pandian is also running a similar business on the opposite side. The relationship between the brothers came under strain. Madhu Pandian wanted to grab the petitioner's husband premises. He had obtained Saravanan's signatures by force in blank stamp papers on 22.07.2018 and fabricated a deed in his favou
The statutory provision barring arrest of women after sunset without Magistrate's permission is directory, not mandatory, ensuring police accountability while allowing public interest considerations.
Section 46(4) of Cr.P.C is directory, allowing police discretion in urgent situations, while maintaining the need for compliance with its provisions.
(1) Legality of Arrests – While failure to adhere to the statutory requirement may not lead to the arrest being declared illegal, the officer concerned may have to offer explanation for inability to ....
Arrest may be authorised only if concerned officer has ‘reason to believe’ and there is `satisfaction qua an arrest’ that person has committed an offence – There must be a direct nexus or live link b....
The court quashed criminal proceedings due to police failure to follow procedural mandates, highlighting the necessity for judicial oversight to prevent abuse of process and protect individual rights....
(1) Arrest by a Police Officer is a mere statutory discretion which facilitates him to conduct proper investigation, in the form of collection of evidence and shall not be termed as mandatory.(2) Arr....
Arrest requires clear individual justification; collective reasoning violates procedural safeguards and renders the arrest illegal.
The judgment establishes that police must justify arrests and follow legal procedures, particularly in non-bailable offenses, to protect individual liberties.
The court established that police officers must comply with statutory requirements before arresting another officer, and failure to do so constitutes a violation of fundamental rights under Article 2....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
