Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.DHANABAL
Felix Suresh – Appellant
Versus
J.Samuel Ponnusmay – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding prosecution sanction. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's evaluation of delay and evidence. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. quashing of proceedings rationale. (Para 16) |
| 5. final conclusion and order. (Para 17) |
ORDER :
P. DHANABAL, J.
1. These Criminal Original Petitions have had been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C. No 94 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram.
2. The petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD) No.1704 of 2019 is arrayed as A1 and the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD) No.3321 of 2019 are arrayed as A2 to A4 respectively in the above said C.C. No.94 of 2018
3. According to the petitioners the respondent herein filed a private complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram for taking cognizance for the offences under sections 120(B),166,195,323,339,340,357 and 506(i) of IPC. The learned Magistrate had taken cognizance against the petitioners on 20.04.2018 for the offences under Sections 294(b),325 and 352 of IPC and issued summons to the petitioners.
4. The petitioner /A1 was working as a Inspector of Police, Ambasamuthiram Police Station and the petitioners/
Prior sanction under Section 197 of Cr.P.C is necessary to prosecute public servants acting in discharge of official duties, and a complaint filed after eight years is barred by limitation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 197(1) Cr.P.C, providing protection to public servants from vexatious proceedings, and the court's em....
The court emphasized that the requirement for sanction under Section 197 of Cr.P.C. is a matter to be determined at trial, and inherent powers under Section 482 cannot quash proceedings based solely ....
The court emphasized that the necessity for prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. must be evaluated in the context of the trial, and allegations of misconduct by public servants do not automatical....
Protection under Section 197 Cr.PC is essential for public servants to prevent frivolous prosecutions arising from actions taken in the course of official duties.
The protection under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is not available to public servants who commit offenses that are not connected with the discharge of their official duties or who act in excess of their autho....
The requirement of prior sanction under Section 197 of the CrPC is crucial for prosecuting public servants for acts done in the discharge of their official duties, to protect them from malicious and ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
