SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2623

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.SOUNTHAR
Saroja – Appellant
Versus
Thiagarajan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Ramesh
For the Respondent: Mr.M.P.Senthil

JUDGMENT :

S. SOUNTHAR, J.

1. The third defendant, who is the daughter of the plaintiff and who was transposed as appellant in the first appeal in the place of the deceased plaintiff, is the appellant herein. The suit is for declaration of title and possession of the plaintiff over the suit property and for consequential injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's possession over the suit property. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court and the findings of the trial Court were affirmed by the first appellate Court. Aggrieved by the concurrent findings, the appellant has come by way of this Second Appeal.

2. According to the plaintiff, the suit property originally belonged to one Sudalaimadan Nadar and after his death, the property was inherited by his three sons, namely, Kuttikan Nadar, Thangiah Nadar and Chelliah Nadar. The said three persons have mortgaged the suit property in favour of the plaintiff, Chellamma Nadachi under usufructuary mortgage deed, Ex-A1, dated 23.11.1945. Thus, the plaintiff has been in possession and enjoyment of the property from the date of mortgage. Subsequently, the first defendant in the suit Thanka Nadachi, wife of Chel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top