IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.SUBRAMANIAN, G.ARUL MURUGAN, JJ.
VA.Pugazhendi - Appellant
Versus
All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam - Respondent
W.M.P.No.2933 of 2025 in W.P.No.258 of 2025, W.M.P.No.2872 of 2025 in W.P.No.265 of 2025, W.M.P.No.4877 of 2025 in W.P.No.252 of 2025 along with W.M.P.No.294 of 2025 in W.P.No.258 of 2025, W.M.P.No.304 of 2025 in W.P.No.265 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.289 of 2025 in W.P.No.252 of 2025
Decided on : 12-02-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction under article 226 for vacating interim orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. validity of resolutions from general council meeting. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. authority's power limited by ongoing civil proceedings. (Para 5) |
| 4. interlocutory orders impacting election commission proceedings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. arguments on the election commission’s jurisdiction. (Para 8 , 10 , 18) |
| 6. restrictions on judicial interference with statutory authority actions. (Para 12 , 22) |
| 7. ratio of jurisdiction under para 15 of the symbols order. (Para 14 , 15 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. establishing jurisdiction thresholds for commission inquiries. (Para 19) |
| 9. court delineating boundaries of election commission's inquiry. (Para 32 , 45) |
| 10. court's conclusion on stay orders and future inquiries by the commission. (Para 44) |
| 11. final orders regarding stay and costs. (Para 46 , 47) |
ORDER :
R. SUBRAMANIAN, J.
1. W.M.P.Nos.2872 of 2025, 2933 of 2025 and 4877 of 2025 have been filed under clause (3) of Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to vacate the interim orders granted by this court on 09.01.2025.
2. The Writ Petitions in W.P.Nos.252, 258 and 269 of 2025 have been filed seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the letters dated 24.12.2024 issued by the Secretary to the Election Commission of India while W.P.Nos.262, 265, 264 of 2025 have been filed seeking a Writ of Prohibition restraining the Election Commission of India from proceeding with or adjudicating the proceedings in furtherance to the letter dated 24.12.2024.
The sum and substance of the grievance of the petitioner, which is a registered political party is as follows:-
3. The petitioner is a political party recognized as such and registered with the Election Commission of India under Section 29A of the Representation of People Act, 1951. Certain disputes arose with reference to the validity of the General Council meeting of the said political party that was held on 11.07.2022, wherein certain amendments to the Constitution of the party were carried out. The validity of the meeting dated 11.07.2022 as well as the validity of the resolutions passed thereat including the ones amending the constitution of the party and the election of the deponent Mr.Edappadi K.Palanisamy as the General Secretary of the party are subject matter of various civil proceedings before this Court and the City Civil Court, Chenai. There are also certain interim orders of injunction which have been challenged upto the Hon'ble Supreme Court. As the result of those interlocutory proceedings in the civil suit Mr.Edappadi K.Palanisamy continues to function as the General Secretary of the Party.
4. While things stood thus some of the Members as well as the non-members of the party had made several representations to the Election Commission touching upon the validity of the General Council meeting dated 11.07.2022, the validity of the resolutions passed therein and other matters. One such petitioner filed a Writ Petition in W.P.No.5300 of 2024 seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the Election Commission to dispose of his representation dated 12.02.2024 in accordance with law. The said Writ Petition came up for hearing before the Division Bench of this Court, to which one of us (Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.Subramanian) was a party and this Court had passed the following order:-
“The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the Election Commission of India to consider his representation dated 12.02.2024 and dispose of it in accordance with law.
2. Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan, learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent/ Election Commission of Inda would submit that the Election Commission has issued notice to the parties and their responses has also been received and the Commission will take a decision within a period of four weeks from today. The Commission will hear all the parties before it reaches a decision.
3. This Writ Petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.”
5. An application was filed by one of the parties
Kunda S.Kadam Vs. Dr.K.K.Soman and others
Shri Sadiq Ali and another Vs. The Election Commission of India, New Delhi and others
Subhash Desai Vs. Principal Secretary Governor of Maharashtra and others
U.P.State Road Transport Corporation and another v. Mohd. Ismail and others
The Election Commission must confirm the existence of rival groups before exercising jurisdiction over political party disputes under Section 29A.
The Election Commission can investigate rival factions of a political party under Para 15 of the Election Symbols Order, 1968, provided it first establishes the existence of such factions.
The Election Commission possesses lawful authority to enforce the Symbols Order, 1968, establishing differentiation in political party recognition and privileges as not arbitrary, supporting electora....
The ECI's power to allot symbols under paragraph 15 of the Symbols Order is independent of its power to register political parties under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and....
The impugned clauses in the letters of registration were referable to the Second Amendment Order 1989 and within the Election Commission's power and jurisdiction.
Point of law: Where the Government or any authority passes an order which is contrary to rules or law it becomes amenable to correction by the courts in exercise of writ jurisdiction
The denial of an electoral symbol without legal justification disrupts democratic elections, necessitating judicial intervention to ensure fairness and equity.
The court established that the Election Symbols Order is an order under the Representation of the People Act, and violations can be grounds for election petitions.
The court established that the Election Symbols Order is integral to the electoral process and violations must be addressed through election petitions, not writs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.