IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. RAJASEKAR, JJ.
Play Games 24x7 Private Limited, A Company Incorporated Under The Companies Act 1956, Represented By Its Authorized Representative Mr. Sameer Chugh and Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat and Ors. – Respondents
W.P. Nos.6784, 6794, 6799, 6970, 8832 and 13158 of 2025
Decided On : 03-06-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge constitutionality of online gaming regulation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's final dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 3 , 65) |
| 3. state's legislative history in regulating online games of skill. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. state legislature's competence vs. central laws on online gambling. (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. discussion on the legality of regulation hours for online gaming. (Para 37 , 38 , 41) |
| 6. public health risks necessitate state regulation of online gaming. (Para 46 , 47 , 64) |
ORDER :
(S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
1. The Writ Petitioners before us are online gaming companies, player associations and individual player. These Writ petitions have been filed with a prayer seeking a Writ of Declaration to declare Section 5 read with Section 14 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gaming and Regulation of Online Games Act, 2022 along with the Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority (Real Money Games) Regulations, 2025 (‘RMG Regulations’) as unconstitutional in so far as its application to online games of skill played with money or other stakes.
PRELUDE:
2. The State of Tamil Nadu, in order to curb the ill effects of online gaming addiction amended the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, 1930 by enacting The Tamil Nadu Gaming and Police Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021. The amended statute prohibited all forms of games being conducted in cyberspace, irrespective of the game being a game of mere skill, if such game is played for a wager, bet, money or other stake.
3. The validity of the Act was challenged before this Hon'ble Court in Junglee Games India Private Limited vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu, 2021, 2021 SCC OnLine Mad. 2767 The Hon'ble Madras High Court struck down Part II of the Tamil Nadu Gaming and Police Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021, which banned wagering or betting in cyberspace, as ultra vires to the Constitution. However, the following observation was made by the Division Bench ;
"130. Accordingly, the impugned Part Il of the Tamil Nadu Gaming and Police Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Act 1 of 2021), which amends the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, 1930, is declared to be ultra vires the Constitution in its entirety and struck down as a consequence. Nothing herein will prevent an appropriate legislation conforming to the constitutional sense of propriety being brought in the field of betting and gambling by the State"
4. Subsequently, the State Government enacted the TAMIL NADU PROHIBITION OF ONLINE GAMBLING AND REGULATION OF ONLINE GAMES ACT , 2022 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act, 2022”) on the recommendation of a Five Member Committee under the Chairmanship of retired Judge of this Hon'ble Court based on inputs received from seventeen stakeholders comprising of representatives from the online gaming industry, think tanks, political parties, players association and social activists on differentiation of real money games and other forms of games, to provide age and money restrictions, to ban advertisements, to prevent money laundering and to provide grievance redressal mechanism.
5. The Act, 2022 was challenged by various Gaming platforms including the petitioners herein in All India Gaming Federation vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others, (2023) SCC OnLine Mad 6973 wherein this Hon'ble High Court upheld the validity of the Act while it struck down the Schedule which included Rummy and poker as games of chance. In the All India Gaming Federation Judgment (hereinafter referred to as “AIGF 2023 Judgment”), the Hon’ble Division Bench has upheld the validity of the Act, but has struck down the Schedule alone. As against this portion of the Order of the Hon'ble Division Bench, the State has filed SLP and the same is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
6. Section 3 of the Act, 2022 provides for establishment of an Expert Body known as the Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority. The Authority in exercise of the power conferred to it under Section 5 of the Act, notified the Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority (Real Money Games) Re
M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India
Ganpati Chaugule vs Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank
Union of India v. Shah Goverdhan L. Kabra Teachers' College
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd) v. Union Of India
Calcutta Guj. Education Society & Another v. Calcutta Municipal Corporation & Others
The court upheld the state's legislative competence to regulate online games of skill, balancing individual rights against public health needs, confirming that such regulations are constitutional.
Pont of Law : Fundamental Rights under Article 19 do not avail to the non-citizens and therefore, petitions are misconceived, cannot be countenanced inasmuch as there are several citizens before this....
Point of Law : On the question whether the power available to the State to issue a notification under Section 14A to exempt a game, clothe it with a power to notify a game which is a game of mere ski....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a regulatory framework to govern online gambling and betting activities, and the absence of specific provisions within the existing le....
The court ruled that police cannot investigate non-cognizable offences without a Magistrate's permission, rendering the charge sheet void, and emphasized the urgent need for modern legislation to reg....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.