IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. RAJASEKAR
Play Games 24x7 Private Limited, A Company Incorporated Under The Companies Act 1956, Represented By Its Authorized Representative Mr. Sameer Chugh – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge constitutionality of online gaming regulation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's final dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 3 , 65) |
| 3. state's legislative history in regulating online games of skill. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. state legislature's competence vs. central laws on online gambling. (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. discussion on the legality of regulation hours for online gaming. (Para 37 , 38 , 41) |
| 6. public health risks necessitate state regulation of online gaming. (Para 46 , 47 , 64) |
ORDER :
(S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
1. The Writ Petitioners before us are online gaming companies, player associations and individual player. These Writ petitions have been filed with a prayer seeking a Writ of Declaration to declare Section 5 read with Section 14 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gaming and Regulation of Online Games Act, 2022 along with the Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority (Real Money Games) Regulations, 2025 (‘RMG Regulations’) as unconstitutional in so far as its application to online games of skill played with money or other stakes.
PRELUDE:
2. The State of Tamil Nadu, in order to curb the ill effects of online gaming addiction amended the Tamil Nadu Gam
M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India
Ganpati Chaugule vs Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank
Union of India v. Shah Goverdhan L. Kabra Teachers' College
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd) v. Union Of India
Calcutta Guj. Education Society & Another v. Calcutta Municipal Corporation & Others
The court upheld the state's legislative competence to regulate online games of skill, balancing individual rights against public health needs, confirming that such regulations are constitutional.
Pont of Law : Fundamental Rights under Article 19 do not avail to the non-citizens and therefore, petitions are misconceived, cannot be countenanced inasmuch as there are several citizens before this....
Point of Law : On the question whether the power available to the State to issue a notification under Section 14A to exempt a game, clothe it with a power to notify a game which is a game of mere ski....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a regulatory framework to govern online gambling and betting activities, and the absence of specific provisions within the existing le....
The court ruled that police cannot investigate non-cognizable offences without a Magistrate's permission, rendering the charge sheet void, and emphasized the urgent need for modern legislation to reg....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.