BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Shamim Ahmed, J.
D.Sathishkumar - Petitioner
Versus
The Principal Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries Department and ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD) No.10967 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.8609 and 10075 of 2021
Decided On : 19-03-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to employment notification. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding cancellation of notification. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's observation on cancellation of selection process. (Para 3) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed due to lack of merit. (Para 4) |
ORDER :
Shamim Ahmed, J.
This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, challenging the Employment Notification Advertisement No. 1 of 2020 dated 05.06.2020 (Ref. No. 3010/Pers-1/2020), on the file of the 2nd Respondent, insofar as it relates to the post of Manager (MIS) only, and all consequential actions that followed. The Petitioner seeks to quash the selection process concerning the post of Manager (MIS) and directs the 2nd Respondent to consider the Petitioner's Representation dated 22.01.2021 for re-examination, strictly in conformity with the prescribed procedure, in a transparent and fair manner.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader for the 1st Respondent and Mr.J.Devanesan, learned counsel for the 2nd Respondent, submitted that, as stated in paragraph 3 of the counter affidavit, the 2nd Respondent had published an advertisement in Notification No.1/2020 dated 05.06.2020 inviting applications to fill one vacancy for the post of Manager (MIS). He further submitted that the entire notification was cancelled by the 3rd Respondent due to complaints from various individuals, and an enquiry was subsequently conducted under Section 81 of the Co-operative Society Act. It was further submitted in paragraph 6 of the counter affidavit that the entire selection process for the post of Manager (MIS) has been entrusted to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. Additionally, the direct recruitment procedure previously adopted by the 2nd Respondent union has been discontinued in compliance with Government directions. Thus, it was submitted that the relief sought by the Petitioner cannot be granted, as the notification has already been cancelled, and the relief sought has become infructuous. Therefore, the Writ Petition lacks merit, and it is prayed that this Court dismiss the Writ Petition
3. Considering the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the 1st Respondent and learned counsel for the 2nd Respondent and the averments in paragraphs 3 and 6 of the counter affidavit filed by the 2nd Respondent, this Court is of the view that Advertisement Notification No.1/2020 dated 05.06.2020 has been cancelled. The entire selection process has been entrusted to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and the direct recruitment procedure previously adopted by the 2nd Respondent union has been discontinued in compliance with Government directions.
4. In view of the above, this Court finds that the relief sought in the present writ petition cannot be granted by this Court, as the entire selection process has been cancelled and fresh selection process has been entrusted to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. Thus, this Court does not find any merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
There shall be no order as to costs. The file is consigned to the record.
A writ petition cannot succeed if the employment notification has been canceled and the selection process has been entrusted to another authority, reflecting the need for compliance with procedural n....
Writ petitions cannot be granted for selection processes that have been cancelled, rendering the petitions infructuous.
The recruitment process cannot be altered post-advertisement; candidates retain rights if the selection was conducted properly.
Mandamus for interview consideration unavailable after recruitment process and appointment concluded.
The cancellation of a selection process must be bona fide and for appropriate reasons, and the State is bound to respect the comparative merit of the candidates.
Candidates do not acquire rights to appointment until they are actually appointed, and the recruitment process can be canceled at the employer's discretion.
The court emphasized the necessity for transparency and compliance with legal procedures in recruitment processes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.