SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5146

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Shamim Ahmed, J.
D.Sathishkumar - Petitioner
Versus
The Principal Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries Department and ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD) No.10967 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.8609 and 10075 of 2021
Decided On : 19-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.P.Madhavan
For the Respondent: Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader, Mr.J.Devanesan

A writ petition cannot succeed if the employment notification has been canceled and the selection process has been entrusted to another authority, reflecting the need for compliance with procedural norms.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus - Challenging employment notification for post of Manager (MIS) - Petitioner sought to quash the notification and sought re-examination consideration. The employment notification was canceled due to complaints, and the selection process was transferred to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Merit of Writ Petition - The court finds no merit in the writ petition since the notification has been canceled and the selection process has been entrusted to another authority. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner challenged the Employment Notification dated 05.06.2020 for the post of Manager (MIS) and sought to quash the selection process, citing procedural fairness.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the selection process has been canceled and transferred to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission.

Issues: Whether the petitioner’s request to consider the representation had any merit after the cancellation of the notification.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that since the selection process had been canceled, the petition lacked merit and could not be granted.

Result: Writ Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's challenge to employment notification. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding cancellation of notification. (Para 2)
3. court's observation on cancellation of selection process. (Para 3)
4. writ petition dismissed due to lack of merit. (Para 4)

ORDER :

Shamim Ahmed, J.

This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, challenging the Employment Notification Advertisement No. 1 of 2020 dated 05.06.2020 (Ref. No. 3010/Pers-1/2020), on the file of the 2nd Respondent, insofar as it relates to the post of Manager (MIS) only, and all consequential actions that followed. The Petitioner seeks to quash the selection process concerning the post of Manager (MIS) and directs the 2nd Respondent to consider the Petitioner's Representation dated 22.01.2021 for re-examination, strictly in conformity with the prescribed procedure, in a transparent and fair manner.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader for the 1st Respondent and Mr.J.Devanesan, learned counsel for the 2nd Respondent, submitted that, as stated in paragraph 3 of the counter affidavit, the 2nd Respondent had published an advertisement in Notification No.1/2020 dated 05.06.2020 inviting applications to fill one vacancy for the post of Manager (MIS). He further submitted that the entire notification was cancelled by the 3rd Respondent due to complaints from various individuals, and an enquiry was subsequently conducted under Section 81 of the Co-operative Society Act. It was further submitted in paragraph 6 of the counter affidavit that the entire selection process for the post of Manager (MIS) has been entrusted to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. Additionally, the direct recruitment procedure previously adopted by the 2nd Respondent union has been discontinued in compliance with Government directions. Thus, it was submitted that the relief sought by the Petitioner cannot be granted, as the notification has already been cancelled, and the relief sought has become infructuous. Therefore, the Writ Petition lacks merit, and it is prayed that this Court dismiss the Writ Petition

3. Considering the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the 1st Respondent and learned counsel for the 2nd Respondent and the averments in paragraphs 3 and 6 of the counter affidavit filed by the 2nd Respondent, this Court is of the view that Advertisement Notification No.1/2020 dated 05.06.2020 has been cancelled. The entire selection process has been entrusted to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and the direct recruitment procedure previously adopted by the 2nd Respondent union has been discontinued in compliance with Government directions.

4. In view of the above, this Court finds that the relief sought in the present writ petition cannot be granted by this Court, as the entire selection process has been cancelled and fresh selection process has been entrusted to the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. Thus, this Court does not find any merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

There shall be no order as to costs. The file is consigned to the record.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top