Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Thangavelu – Appellant
Versus
Kandaswami Gounder, S/o Chinna Gounder – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partition and possession claims (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant allegations and defense (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. appeals and decisions (Para 14 , 18) |
| 4. substantial questions of law in appeals (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. burden of proof in property sales (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. legal necessity and proof (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. insufficiency of pleadings as evidence (Para 39 , 40) |
| 8. conclusion and recent judgments (Para 47 , 48) |
ORDER :
V. Lakshminarayanan, J.
The plaintiff appeals. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred as per their ranks in the suit.
2.The plaintiff presented OS.No.653 of 1978, seeking partition and separate possession, on the file of the Sub Court at Coimbatore. The prayer in the suit was as follows:-
“a)directing the division of Schedule II and IV and 3/4th share in Schedule III into 3 equal shares and put the plaintiff in possession of one such a share;
b)divide 1/4th share in Schedule III into four equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff;
c)to appoint a commissioner to divide the properties.”
3.The plaintiff, defendants 2 & 3 are the children of the first defendant and one, Marathal. The first defendant and his brother, o
The Kartha of a joint family must prove legal necessity for alienation of family property; failure to demonstrate necessity invalidates alienation for coparceners' shares.
The legal principle established is that in cases involving the sale of joint family property, the burden of proving legal necessity lies with the purchaser only if the plaintiffs have properly pleade....
The burden of proving legal necessity for the alienation of ancestral property lies on the alienee, and the transaction must be for the family's benefit, binding all undivided family members.
In joint family property disputes, a guardian may transact on behalf of minors without court sanction, provided sales serve family interests.
A member of an Aliyasantana family has a pre-existing right to seek partition of family property without needing to cancel a sale deed executed by another family member, provided the alienation was n....
Absolute sale deed with separate repurchase agreement not mortgage; minors must challenge guardian’s alienation within 3 years of majority by seeking cancellation.
It is now well settled principles in regard to powers under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure that when Courts below record its concurrent findings of facts based on appreciation of facts and ev....
The burden of proof lies with plaintiffs to demonstrate ownership rights, and valid alienation of property by family members for legal necessity cannot be contested without sufficient evidence.
The purchaser must prove the legal necessity for the transaction, and it is not necessary for the purchaser to show that every bit of the consideration was actually applied for meeting the family nec....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
