SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5280

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
M. Seethapathy – Appellant
Versus
Srinivasan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Y. Jyothish Chander
For the Respondent: Mr. A. Maheshnath

JUDGMENT :

K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

1. This Second Appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 01.09.2022 passed in A.S. No.36 of 2018, on the file of the Sub Court, Arakkonam, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 31.07.2018 passed in O.S.No.77 of 2011, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Arakkonam.

2. The plaintiff has filed the suit in O.S. No.77/2011 for declaring the registered Gift Deed dated 28.12.2006 executed by the 4th defendant in favour of the 6th defendant as null and void and not binding on the plaintiff and to declare the common passage situate on the west of the suit property measures only 16 feet in width and for permanent injunction.

3. According to the plaintiff, he had purchased the suit property measuring an extent of 1298 sq. ft. in S.Nos.342/2B and 2C with specific boundaries morefully described in the suit schedule from the 4th defendant under a sale deed dated 16.07.2003, who sold the same to the plaintiff as power agent of one Bakthan and others. Though the western boundary is mentioned as common passage, no specific measurement was given in the sale deed, but in the ground only 16 feet passage remains and the same is also admitte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top