IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
M. Namachivayam, S/o. Mr.Manickam Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Chief Executive Officer – Respondent
ORDER :
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.
The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 21.04.2014 bearing Reference No. Na.Ka.No.36041/E3(2)/03, passed by the first respondent. By the said order, the petitioner, who was working as Bee Fieldman Grade-I in the Gudalur Khadar Shop, was removed from service for the alleged misappropriation of Board funds amounting to Rs.2,85,485/-, resulting in a shortage of stock in the Gudalur Khadar Shop, and Rs.4,13,883/- towards loss of funds resulting in a shortage of stock in the Udagai Carpentry and Blacksmith Unit.
2. The petitioner, while working as Bee Fieldman Grade-I, was issued with a charge memo. The charge memo dated 17.12.2003 reads as follows:
“Charge No.1
A fake loan list were prepared in the name of Gudalur Government Hospital Employees and the Board funds amounting to Rs.64,519/- was misappropriated.
Charge No.2
Fake loan lists were prepared as if the teachers of Fatima Girls High School, Gudalur, Khadi borrowed Khadi loan and embezzled Rs.20,379/- from the Board.
Charge No.3
He prepared fake lists as if teachers of Saint Maria Annai Primary School, Gudalur have taken loans and embezzled Rs.8,224/- of the Board funds.
Charge No.4
Rs.56,10
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to principles of natural justice and require cogent evidence; failure of the authority to produce documents and examine witnesses invalidates the outcome.
Procedural violations in disciplinary proceedings render removal orders arbitrary and unenforceable, emphasizing the need for fair conduct in evidence presentation.
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to specified regulations; lack of defined misconduct requires clarity for fairness.
Disciplinary actions must adhere to principles of natural justice, and failure to provide relevant evidence undermines the validity of proceedings.
The court emphasized that disciplinary actions must obey principles of natural justice, including evidence for charges and payment of subsistence allowance during suspension; non-compliance voids san....
The Disciplinary Authority can order further enquiry only if serious defects exist in the initial enquiry; it cannot do so after a finding of exoneration.
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to rules of natural justice while allowing for reasonable discretion by authorities, particularly regarding witness testimony; dismissal upheld for proven misappr....
The court ruled that disciplinary dismissals must adhere to natural justice and have sufficient evidence, particularly when severe penalties are imposed, as seen in cases of clerical errors.
: Service – Punishment - once the charges levelled against the delinquent employee are proved then it is for the appointing authority to decide as to what punishment should be imposed on the delinque....
Termination without adequate evidence and disregard for fair procedures violates principles of natural justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.