Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
District Collector, District Collectorate, Mayiladuthurai District – Appellant
Versus
Dhanraj Jain – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the writ petition and land claims. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contentions raised by the appellants and respondents regarding land classification. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT :
S.M.Subramaniam J.
Under assail is the writ order dated 13.11.2024 passed in W.P.No.23909 of 2024. The District Collector, Mayiladuthurai District is the appellant before this Court.
I.Facts in Nutshell:
2. The respondents 1 to 4 have instituted a writ petition seeking a direction to the official respondents to issue patta in the name of the respondents herein for the subject lands in T.S.Nos.57/2, 57/4, 57/5 and 57/6, Old S.No.425/1A, Sirkali Town, Mayiladuthurai District.
3. The 1st respondent herein gave a representation on 23.04.2024 to the Tahsildar, Sirkali Village to grant individual patta in his name in respect of the property situated at Old S.No.425/1A, T.S.No.54, Block 24, Ward-A, Sirkali Village, Sirkali Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District measuring about 0.13.0 ares, as per the sale deed registered as Document No.1529 of 2024. The Tahsildar/3rd respondent on verification of revenue records through letter dated 10.05.2024 informed the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Sirkali that the subjec
Judicial review under Article 226 is limited to ensuring procedural legality without adjudicating disputed facts, emphasizing that title issues belong in civil courts.
The State Government does not have the power to review its own orders unless such power is specifically conferred by statute. The State Government cannot exercise its power of review after a long del....
The High Court cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact recorded by quasi-judicial authorities in the absence of any jurisdictional error or patent perversity.
Petitioner failed to establish timely claims and lineage rights for land ownership, justifying dismissal of appeals.
The Director of Survey and Settlement lacks jurisdiction to initiate suo moto proceedings under Section 5(2) for an appealable order, as per Section 12(2) of the Tamil Nadu Inam Estates Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
