BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Sahayaraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions seek police protection and fir quashing. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. prosecution alleges forcible dispossession attempt. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. petitioner claims lawful authority via power of attorney. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments: civil dispute, prior orders favor possession. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. respondent's defense: settled possession protects against force. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. governing principles on quashing firs and settled possession. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. no police aid for extra-judicial possession recovery. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. fir not quashed; requires investigation of forcible acts. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. both petitions dismissed; due process required. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
ORDER :
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
Preface:
1.These two Criminal Original Petitions, though couched in different forms of relief, arise out of a single and intensely contested dispute concerning possession over an item of immovable property. One petition seeks police protection to enable the petitioner to take possession of the property, while the other seeks quashment of the FIR registered
Anukul Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Sheila Sebastian v. R. Jawaharaj
Rame Gowda (D) by LRs. v. M. Varadappa Naidu (D) by LRs.
Maria Margarida Sequeira Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de Sequeira
Police protection for property possession denied absent executable decree; FIR alleging forcible entry and damage not quashed despite civil dispute background, as specific criminal acts require inves....
Ownership and possession negates criminal trespass charges against a person regarding their own property.
If possession itself is not with the complainant, there can be no offence of criminal trespass into property not belonging to complainant.
Inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS to quash proceedings must be exercised sparingly; omnibus allegations without specific overt acts against a peripheral accused who is a mere employee just....
Criminal proceedings arising from property disputes, where allegations are vague and omnibus, constitute an abuse of process of law and should be quashed when the essential ingredients of the alleged....
FIR quashed as allegations fail prima facie to constitute Sections 451,447,506 IPC offences in civil property possession dispute lacking trespass intent and intimidation alarm, preventing abuse of pr....
Criminal proceedings cannot proceed in civil disputes, aimed at preventing misuse of legal processes. Courts must ensure that only matters with substantial criminal allegations are pursued judiciousl....
This judgment establishes that police powers do not extend to adjudicating civil disputes or facilitating possession changes without due process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.