SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 116

S. K. SAHOO
Prafulla Mundari @ Pelka – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Arun Kumar Budhia Amicus Curiae, for the Appellant; Mr. Arupananda Das Addl. Govt. Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

S.K. Sahoo, J. - The appellant Prafulla Mundari @ Pelka faced trial in the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Sundargarh camp at Rourkela in Special G.R. Case No.417 of 2013/Trial No.29 of 2017 for commission of offences punishable under section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereafter POCSO Act) on the accusation that he committed rape on the victim girl, who was aged about eight years at the time of occurrence, in a dilapidated house situated at village Lindra under Bisra police station in the district of Sundargarh.

The learned trial Court vide impugned judgment and order dated 21.03.2018 found the appellant guilty of both the charges and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand), in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code. No separate sentence was awarded for the conviction of the appellant under section 6 of the POCSO Act in view of the provision under section 42 of the said Act.

2. The prosecution case, as per the first

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top