ARINDAM SINHA
Sudharani Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Dhenkanal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arindam Sinha, J. - Mr. Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner, who is Secretary of a Women Self Help Group (WSHG). He submits, opposite party no.6 has been given engagement for acquiring paddy for last three years.
2. Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and relies on paragraph 9 in the counter filed. Said paragraph is reproduced below.
'9. That it is further humbly submitted that the registration process for KMS 2022-23 has already been completed since 30.09.2022 and the Opp. Party No.6 in whose favour the area is delineated and the said WSHG is going to procure paddy w.e.f. 28.12.2022 as decided in the District Level Paddy Procurement Committee, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.'
3. Mr. Panigrahi, learned advocate appears on behalf of private opposite party no.6 and relies upon his client's counter for disclosure dated 4th December, 2022 at annexure-C. This is information given by Food Supplies and Consumer Welfare Department, Government of Odisha regarding farmer registration status report of Dhenkanal District from 15th July, 2022 to 4th December, 2022.
4. Information obtained from the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.