SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 522

ARINDAM SINHA
Sudharani Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Dhenkanal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Subrata Mishra, Advocate, A. K. Sharma, Advocate, P. Panigrahi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arindam Sinha, J. - Mr. Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner, who is Secretary of a Women Self Help Group (WSHG). He submits, opposite party no.6 has been given engagement for acquiring paddy for last three years.

2. Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and relies on paragraph 9 in the counter filed. Said paragraph is reproduced below.

    '9. That it is further humbly submitted that the registration process for KMS 2022-23 has already been completed since 30.09.2022 and the Opp. Party No.6 in whose favour the area is delineated and the said WSHG is going to procure paddy w.e.f. 28.12.2022 as decided in the District Level Paddy Procurement Committee, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.'

3. Mr. Panigrahi, learned advocate appears on behalf of private opposite party no.6 and relies upon his client's counter for disclosure dated 4th December, 2022 at annexure-C. This is information given by Food Supplies and Consumer Welfare Department, Government of Odisha regarding farmer registration status report of Dhenkanal District from 15th July, 2022 to 4th December, 2022.

4. Information obtained from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top