Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA
Padmaja Manjari Swain – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' registration for paddy selling. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. opposite parties' objections to application. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. welfare objective of paddy procurement system. (Para 5) |
| 4. justification for granting petitioners' request. (Para 6) |
| 5. final order directing permission for paddy selling. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
Judgment :
A.C. Behera, J.
This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for directing the Opposite Parties to register the names of the petitioners as farmers for selling their yield paddy of the year 2025-26. Because, their names have not been registered in PPS Portal, as farmers for selling their paddy only due to the avoidance of the Opposite Parties for non-registration of their names.
2. It is the case as well as the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners that, they(petitioners) had submitted their applications for registration of their names as farmers on dated 21.08.2025, which was much prior to 25.08.2025, but, sill then, the Opposite Parties did not register their names in PPS Portal as farmers. For which, they(petitioners) are not able to sell their yield paddy of
The court upheld that the rigid enforcement of registration protocols should not impede farmers' access to sell their produce, affirming the system's purpose to support farmer livelihoods.
Judicial intervention is warranted when technicalities inhibit farmers' access to government procurement systems, emphasizing the welfare objective of agricultural policies.
The court emphasized the need for transparency and consistency in the registration process for procurement, ensuring that decisions are communicated within a reasonable timeframe.
Exclusion of a party from a procurement process without a hearing violates principles of natural justice and renders the action illegal.
Exclusion from administrative decisions must comply with natural justice, ensuring the affected party is given a fair chance to respond before adverse actions are taken.
The exclusion of a party from procurement proceedings without a fair opportunity to be heard violates principles of natural justice, and any prior rights must be respected.
The exclusion of a party from a procurement list without a hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating reconsideration of such decisions.
Administrative decisions affecting rights must observe principles of natural justice, including providing an opportunity to be heard.
Authority must comply with the principles of natural justice by providing an opportunity to be heard before making adverse decisions affecting rights previously established.
Exclusion from government procurement processes without providing a fair hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating reconsideration of such administrative decisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
