IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Satyabhama SHG, Samara, represented through its Secretary – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner- Satyabhama WSHG praying for quashing the Office Letter/Order No.7651 dated 05.12.2025 under Annexure-1 issued by the Collector, Bolangir (Opp. Party No.3) disallowing the petitioner-WSHG from participating in the paddy procurement during the KMS 2025-26 and to direct the Opp. Parties for allowing the petitioner-WSHG to participate in the paddy procurement during the KMS 2025-26.
2. The case of the petitioner-SHG is that, as per the Letter No.4729 dated 01.08.2025 of the Chief Civil Supplies Officer, Bolangir, the petitioner along with other WSHGs were allowed to undertake farmers registration at their respective jurisdictional areas for the KMS 2025-26 (Kharif) subject to the final approval by the District Level Paddy Procurement Committee (DLPC). Thereafter, the petitioner WSHG prepared the list of registered farmers with farmer codes within its are for KMS 2025-26 (Kharif). The petitioner-WSHG also registered itself in the online registration of SHG under Food Supplies and Consumer Welfare Department. The CDPO, Gudvella had clarif
A public authority must comply with principles of natural justice by providing an opportunity to be heard before issuing orders affecting rights.
Exclusion of a party from a procurement process without a hearing violates principles of natural justice and renders the action illegal.
Exclusion from government procurement processes without providing a fair hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating reconsideration of such administrative decisions.
Exclusion from administrative benefits without a hearing violates principles of natural justice and is deemed arbitrary, especially when rights have been established.
Administrative decisions affecting rights must adhere to principles of natural justice, requiring an opportunity for the affected party to be heard before exclusion or adverse action.
Administrative decisions affecting rights must observe principles of natural justice, including providing an opportunity to be heard.
The exclusion of a party from a procurement list without a hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating reconsideration of such decisions.
The exclusion of a party from procurement proceedings without a fair opportunity to be heard violates principles of natural justice, and any prior rights must be respected.
Exclusion from administrative decisions must comply with natural justice, ensuring the affected party is given a fair chance to respond before adverse actions are taken.
Authority must comply with the principles of natural justice by providing an opportunity to be heard before making adverse decisions affecting rights previously established.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.