Back
S. MURALIDHAR
Jhar Mining Infra Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Cmd, Managing Coalfields Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner, M/s. Jhar Mining Infra Private Limited has filed the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('the Act') seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the Petitioner and Opposite Party No.1 (Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.) (MCL) arising out of a tender document.
2. The background facts are that the MCL published a notice inviting tender (NIT) dated 23rd March, 2018 and RFQ and RFP documents (hereafter 'Tender documents') for setting up of Hingula Washery at Hingula area, MCL on Build-Operate Maintain Basis. The Washery was to be set up with a proposed throughput capacity of 10 MTPA of raw coal (Dry basis). The Petitioner submitted its bid on 2nd July, 2018 and deposited a bid amount of Rs.50 lakh. On 7th February, 2019 MCL issued a Letter of Intimation (LOI) to the Petitioner informing the Petitioner that it had been identified as the lowest bidder for the project. The Petitioner was requested to return the signed LoI as a mark of acceptance. The LoI stated that a letter of award (LoA) would be issued to the Petitioner after receipt of environmental clearance (EC) in accordance with the ter
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the acceptance of a Letter of Intimation (LoI) can create a contractual relationship, and the obligations of the selected bidder, as per the t....
The existence of an arbitration agreement under Section 11 requires clear indication of a binding contract, which was absent in this case; the Letter of Intent was merely a precursor to an actual con....
The arbitration clause becomes operative only when a concluded contract exists, and the absence of a concluded contract renders the application for appointment of an Arbitrator under Section 11 (6) o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties for resolution of disputes as per clause 13.5 of the tender document, and the determi....
A conditional Letter of Acceptance does not create a binding contract or arbitration agreement if its conditions remain unfulfilled.
The court's jurisdiction under Section 11 of the A&C Act is limited to determining the existence of an agreement with an arbitration clause and the presence of arbitral disputes.
Disputes arising before the parties enter into a contract are not arbitrable under the arbitration clause in the subsequent contract agreement.
The Court's limited jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Act does not allow for a detailed consideration of the disputes, which is to be determined by the arbitrator.
Parties with an arbitration clause must resolve disputes through arbitration, as established in the contract terms.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
