J. K. MAHESHWARI, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
R. Z. Malpani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case involves disputes arising from a tender process. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. arguments regarding existence of a concluded contract. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. court's analysis focuses on arbitration agreement's existence. (Para 19 , 21 , 22 , 29 , 38 , 41 , 42) |
| 4. clarification on arbitration agreement formation criteria. (Para 20 , 27 , 36) |
| 5. final ruling allows appeal and sets aside high court order. (Para 43) |
JUDGMENT :
J.K. MAHESHWARI, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated 01.10.2025 of the Bombay High Court (hereinafter referred to as “High Court”) in Arbitration Application (L) No. 1417 of 2025.
3. By the impugned order, the High Court disposed of the application filed by the Respondent under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “1996 Act”) and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties.
FACTS
4. The Appellant, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) is a State Government company, which is a fully-owned corporate entity owned by the Government of Maharashtra. It is an el
State of Himachal Pradesh and Another v. OASYS Cybernatics Pvt. Ltd.
South Eastern Coalfields Limited and Others v. S. Kumar’s Associates AKM (JV)
NBCC (India) Ltd. v. Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.
Office for Alternative Architecture v. Ircon Infrastructure and Services Ltd.
Maharshi Dayanand University v. Anand Coop. L/C Society Ltd.
UNISSI (India) (P) Ltd. v. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Vidya Drolia and Others v. Durga Trading Corporation
SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spg.
In Re: Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under Arbitration Act, 1996 & Stamp Act, 1899
Govind Rubber Ltd. v. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia (P) Ltd.
M.R. Engineers and Contractors (P) Ltd. v. Som Datt Builders Ltd.
The existence of an arbitration agreement under Section 11 requires clear indication of a binding contract, which was absent in this case; the Letter of Intent was merely a precursor to an actual con....
Appointment of Sole Arbitrator – When there is a reference in second contract to terms and conditions of first contract, arbitration clause would not ipso facto be applicable to second contract unles....
A conditional Letter of Acceptance does not create a binding contract or arbitration agreement if its conditions remain unfulfilled.
Arbitration – Appointment of Arbitrator - Parties though had agreed to submit the jurisdiction of the High Court of Gujarat, they had not agreed to the procedure for the appointment of an Arbitrator.....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the acceptance of a Letter of Intimation (LoI) can create a contractual relationship, and the obligations of the selected bidder, as per the t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.