S. TALAPATRA, SAVITRI RATHO
D. Anita Majhi @ Mila – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. Talapatra, J. - We have heard Mr. P.K. Jena, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners as well as Mr. J. Katikia, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the StateOpposite Parties.
2. By means of this petition, the Petitioners have urged this court to quash the cases catalogued under Annexure-1, which are pending against the Petitioners either in the investigation stage or where the trial has been held up. A catalogue of those cases where the trial has commenced, but not concluded have been provided by the Petitioners including their status on the day of filing of the writ petition.
3. Mr. Jena, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners in his submission has drawn our attention to similar other cases where the Petitioners have already been acquitted. He has further added that Petitioners are being hunted by the State for their social activities, non-violent and peaceful in nature. But the State has, without any foundation, considered their activities as hostile to the State and deliberately branded their activities as 'extremist' which are absolute
Abdul Rehman Antulay and Ors. Vs. R.S. Nayak and Ors.
Hussainara Khatoon & Ors. vs. Home Secretary, State Of Bihar
Hussainara Khatoon (supra) and the Common Cause vs. Union of India and others: (1996) 4 SCC 33
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India: (1978) 2 SCR 621
Manubhai Ratilal Patel Tr. Ushaben vs. State of Gujarat and Ors.: (2013) 1 SCC 314
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.