BISWANATH RATH
Giridhari Bag – Appellant
Versus
Commandant, Orissa State Armed Police (OSAP), Koraput – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Biswanath Rath, J. - Originally the Application was filed in the Orissa Administrative Tribunal. On abolition of the Tribunal, the matter was transferred to this Court for its disposal at this end.
2. The Applicant (Petitioner) through the Original Application (presently Writ Petition) involves the following prayer :-
'I. The orders passed under Annexure-2 and under Annexure-4 by the Respondent Nos.1 and 4 be quashed.
II. The Respondents be directed to reinstate in service retrospectively w.e.f. the date of his removal i.e. 21.05.02 with all consequential service and pecuniary benefits.
III. And pass any other order/orders as deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.'
3. Background involving the case is the Petitioner is a Scheduled Caste person. After passing Matriculation/Board of Secondary Education Certificate Course in the year 1998, being unable to undertake further education, the Petitioner sought for an employment. Coming to know of an advertisement for the post of regular recruitment of Sepoy by the Selection Board at OSAP 3rd Battalion, Koraput, the Petitioner applied for the said post. Based on recruitment process and interview, he was found to b
Mohinder Singh Gill & anr. Vrs. The Chief Election Commissioner
Avtar Singh vrs. Union of India & ors. : (2016) 8 SCC 471
Babu Lal vrs. State of Haryana & ors. : (1991) SCC 335
Deputy General Manager (Appellate Authority) & Ors. vs. Ajai Kumar Srivastava 10 (2001) 2 SCC 386 11
Joginder Singh vrs. Union Territory of Chandigarh : 2015 AIR(SCW) 483 (AIR 2015 SC (Supp.) 1536
K.Gopal @ Khola Gopal vrs. Union of India & ors : AIR 2015 SCW 483
Lazarus Estates Ltd. V. Beasley [(1956) 1 QB 702: (1956) 2 WLR 502: (1956) 1 ALL ER 341 (CA)]
Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2000) 6 SCC 224: 2000 SCC (Cri) 1056
Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. & anr. vrs. Anil Kanwariya : (2021) 10 SCC 136
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath (1994) 1 SCC 1: AIR 1994 SC 853
Shravan Kumar Jha & ors. Vrs. Ram Sevak Sharma & ors : AIR 1991 SC 309
Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society v. M. Tripura Sundari Devi (1990) 3 SCC 655
An employee who suppresses material information or gives false information cannot claim a right to continue in service.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that failure to disclose criminal antecedents may not justify termination of employment, especially if the charges are trivial and do not affect th....
Service matter - Criminal Cases pending - Order of removal - Quash of - While passing order of termination for giving false information, the employer may take note of special circumstances of case if....
Probationary employees may be terminated for violating appointment terms, including misrepresenting criminal history, without requiring formal procedural safeguards.
Suppressing minor criminal information does not automatically disqualify candidates for government service; context and fairness must guide the decision-making process.
Suppression of material information in the attestation form justifies termination under the Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001, and amounts to moral turpitude.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.