SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 81

ARINDAM SINHA, S. K. MISHRA
Bidyadhar Dash – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
J. R. Dash, Advocate, A. K. Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Dash, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, impugned is order dated 30th June, 1998 in Lease Revision Case no.597 of 1998, initiated suo motu. The order was passed by the Additional District Magistrate under section 7A(3) of then Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962. He draws attention to second proviso under sub-section (3), which says that no proceeding under the section shall be initiated after expiry of 14 years from date of the order. He demonstrates from impugned order itself that the case was registered in year, 1998 suo motu against order dated 15th September, 1975, passed more than 14 years before. 

2. Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, inter alia, the section has undergone amendments. 

3. On perusal of present section 7-A we find same underwent amendments by Orissa Act no.38 of 1976, Orissa Act no.18 of 1981 and Odisha Act no.26 of 2013. Parties are to produce those amending Acts on adjourned date, for further hearing and adjudication of the writ petition. 

4. List on 25th January, 2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top