Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI, MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Bhajamana Beherason Of Late Bhagirathi Behera – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha Represented By Principal Secretary To Government Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the leasehold property and its legal actions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposition arguments regarding jurisdiction and service of notice. (Para 3) |
| 3. analysis of service of notice and procedural fairness. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. decision on the validity of the cancellation order. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final resolution of the writ petition. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT :
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
THE CHALLENGE :
The petitioner, transferee of leasehold property of Late Bauri Muduli @ Bauribandhu Muduli, assails Order dated 30.11.1987, copy of which is at Annexure-4, passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Bhubaneswar in Revision Case No.417 of 1983 (arising out of Waste Land Lease Case No.1466 of 1973) in exercise of powers conferred under Section 7A(3) of the Odisha Government Land Settlement Act, 1962, (for brevity referred to as “OGLS Act”) cancelling the lease granted by the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar as also consequential Order dated 30.06.1990 (Annexure-5) passed by said Tahasildar with a direction to the Record Keeper to correct Record-of-Rights, with the following prayer(s):
“Under the aforesaid circumstances, more fully narrated hereinabove the petitioner most humbly pray
The court reaffirmed that failing to provide proper notice to affected parties violates principles of natural justice, rendering administrative orders void.
A statutory authority must adhere to the principles of natural justice and cannot initiate proceedings after the statutory limitation period has expired, as occurred in this case following the incorr....
The detection of fraud and material irregularities in the lease settlement process, and the fair and justified action taken by the authority in promptly cancelling the leases.
The court ruled that administrative decisions affecting rights must provide specific grounds and ensure the affected parties have a right to a fair hearing.
The court established that decisions affecting property rights must adhere to principles of natural justice, ensuring affected parties are given the right to be heard.
Authority cannot cancel confirmed leases under a different statute, maintaining jurisdiction of High Court to intervene when lower authority exceeds legal bounds.
The resumption of land under Section 3-B cannot be solely based on observations of land lying fallow; substantial evidence of actual non-use for its intended purpose is required.
Due process must be observed in lease cancellations, including the right to notice and opportunity to be heard; failure to do so violates natural justice principles.
The court ruled that administrative bodies must act within jurisdiction, and violations of due process make orders void, reinforcing the court's authority to intervene in such instances.
The revisional authority can exercise powers to rectify injustices despite delays, particularly in cases of documented fraud and jurisdictional excesses under the Orissa Estate Abolition Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
