SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 9

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi, J.
Saroj Ku. Sethy - Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
FAO No. 315 of 2019
Decided On : 13-08-2025 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Jena, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sudhansu Mohan Pattanayak, CGC

The court held that a valid reason existed for the delay in filing the compensation claim due to the appellant's severe injuries, warranting the condonation of delay under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act.

Headnote:(A) Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Section 17 - Compensation for injuries sustained while boarding a running train - Appellant suffered severe injuries, resulting in loss of a leg, which justified delay in filing claim application. The Tribunal's rejection of the condonation petition was found to be unjustified. (Paras 5, 6)

(B) Delay in filing claim application - The Court held that a valid reason for the delay existed due to the appellant's severe injuries, resulting in an unfair hindrance to timely action. (Paras 4, 6)

Facts of the case:
The Appellant filed a compensation claim of Rs.8,00,000/- for injuries sustained from falling off a moving train on 19.10.2013, seeking interest from the date of the incident. The Tribunal rejected the delay petition based on the appellant’s inability to act timely due to severe injuries.

Findings of Court:
The delay in filing the claim application was unjustly rejected; the order of the Tribunal was set aside and the case was remitted for fresh adjudication.

Issues: The primary issues were whether the delay in filing the claim application should have been condoned given the circumstances of the appellant's severe injuries.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court determined that a substantial reason existed for the delay due to the appellant's poor health and inability to take action personally, thus justice required that the delay be condoned.

Result: The order dated 11.01.2019 was set aside, and the matter was remanded back for re-adjudication.

Table of Content
1. claim for compensation due to injury aboard a train. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. court's rationale for condoning delay in filing. (Para 6)
3. final order to dispose of the fao. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi, J.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The present Appeal has been filed by the Appellant with the following prayer:

“It is therefore prayed that let this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this appeal, call for LCR issue notice to the Respondent after hearing the parties the order dated 11.01.2019 passed in M.A. No.56 of 2018 by the learned Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar be set-aside and further be pleased to remand the case for re-adjudicate by the learned Railway Claims’ Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar for the interest of justice;

And pass any other order/orders as would deem fit and proper in this Hon’ble Court.”

4. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant had filed an application before the Railway Claim’s Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar claiming compensation of Rs.8,00,000/- with 6% interest per annum from the date of incident on account of the injury sustained by him being fell down from the running train while he boarded in Paradip-Cuttack C.P. No.2 passenger Train on 19.10.2013 at Banabihari Galipur.

5. Learned counsel for the Appellant further submits that the Appellant had filed a petition under Section 17 of the Railway Claim’s Tribunal Act, 1987 for condonation of delay on the ground that the Appellant was severely injured and lost his leg and remained in bed for a long time and his elder brother was given the charge for filing his case, but, he could not do in time. Due to sever injury suffered by the Appellant, he could not contact his Advocate and procure the police paper to file the appeal. However, the Tribunal rejected the said petition for condonaton of delay.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the view that since this case relates to Railway compensation and the Appellant was suffering because of the severe injured, the delay in filing the claim application should have been condoned. Accordingly, the order dated 11.01.2019 passed by the Railway Claim’s Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar in MA No.56 of 2018 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Railway Claim’s Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar to pass a reasoned order afresh within one month from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, this FAO is disposed of.

8. Interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top