SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 90

ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
 
Smt. Renuka Dei, Wife of Patitapaban Ojha - Petitioner
Versus
State of Odisha, Represented through Commissioner-cum-Secretary Water Resources Department, Odisha Bhubaneswar, District: Khordha and Ors. – Opp. Parties 
W.P.(C) No.7447 of 2021
Decided On : 01-08-2025 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Gyana Ranjan Sethi, Ms. Babita Kumari Pattanaik with Mr. Manoja Kumar Khuntia, Advocates
For the Opposite parties : Mr. Shantanu Das, Additional Standing Counsel.

Financial upgradation under the Revised Assured Career Progression Scheme is warranted upon completion of 30 years of service, irrespective of subsequent promotions.

Headnote:This case addresses the petitioner's grievance concerning the non-grant of financial upgradation under the Revised Assured Career Progression Scheme (RACPS). The Court found that the petitioner was entitled to the benefits of RACP as she had completed 30 years of service by 2008 and thus directed the opposite parties to grant financial upgradation. The issues framed included whether the completed service was sufficient for RACP benefits. The Court reasoned that the petitioner's service, stipulated by law, warranted financial upgradation irrespective of her promotion status. The final ruling affirms the need for the government to revise the petitioner's pension benefits in compliance with the RACP requirements.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks financial upgradation under racps. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding completion of service and financial benefits. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court emphasizes entitlement rights under racps. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.

Non-grant of financial upgradation under the Revised Assured Career Progression Scheme (for brevity referred to as “RACPS”) in the Grade Pay of Rs.4,600/- brought the petitioner before this Court beseeching exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with the following pray(s):

"It is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon‘ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the case, call for the records and after hearing both the parties pass the following reliefs;

i) To direct the opposite parties to refix the pension of petitioner after granting 3rd financial upgradation in pay band-2, scale of pay of Rs.9300/- to 34800/- with grade pay of Rs.4600/- under RACP w.e.f. 01.01.2013 as per Notification 19.09.2015 and ratio decided in O.A.No.2328(C) of 2017 confirmed by this Hon‘ble Court in W.P.(C) No28074 of 2019;

ii) To direct the opposite parties to release the arrear salary consequent upon granting 3rd financial upgradation in pay band-2, scale of pay of Rs.9300/- to 34800/- with grade pay of Rs 4600/- under RACP w.e.f. 01.01.2013.

iii) And pass such other order/orders as may be deemed fit and proper for the interest of justice.

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray."

PLEADINGS

2. Having entered into Government service on 14.06.1978 (vide Service Book copy of which is at Annexure-1), as Lower Division Clerk, the petitioner posted in the Office of Superintending Engineer, Upper Kolab Dam Circle, Koraput got transferred to function as such at the Eastern Circle, Cuttack and was granted Time-Bound Advancement taking entry grade from his initial date of joining on 14.06.1978.

2.1. The petitioner on completion of 30 years of Government service as on 13-14.06.2008, she is entitled for the benefit of 3rd RACPS attune with the Finance Department Resolution dated 06.02.2013 with effect from 01.01.2013 with grade pay at Rs.4,600/-.

2.2. As the pay has not been fixed appropriately, so also pensionary benefits, this writ petition has been filed.

Hearing:

3. The instant writ petition got disposed of on 04.03.2021 at the stage of admission with the direction to the opposite parties to “look into the grievance of the petitioner vide Annexure-6 and take decision, as appropriate, taking into consideration the development through Annexure-5 and also the plea taken in the writ petition”. Aggrieved thereby, the opposite parties proceeded in intra-Court appeal (W.A. No.1026 of 2022) with the complaint that without affording opportunity of placing para-wise reply to the writ petition, prejudice did ensue. This Court in Division Bench vide Order dated 20.03.2023 disposed of said writ appeal remitting the matter with the following observation and direction:

"1. On the short ground that the impugned order was passed on the very first date without affording an opportunity to the Appellants-State to file a para- wise reply to the writ petition, the impugned order dated 4th March, 2021 passed in W.P.(C) No.7447 of 2021 is hereby set aside and the said writ petition is remitted to the Roster Bench of the learned Single Judge, where it will be listed for directions on 10th May, 2023.

2. Replies will be filed by the State to the writ petition positively on or before 1st May, 2023 and rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed by the writ petitioner before 10th May, 2023. It is made clear that no further time will be granted to either party for that purpose. The learned Single Judge is requested to proceed with the matter on merits and endeavour to dispose it of as expeditiously as possible.

3. Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of."

3.1. Accordingly, being restored to file, this matter was listed on 22.07.2025.

3.2. Sri Shantanu Da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top