Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
Sibo Sankar Mishra
Basanta Kumar Pradhan and another – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. convicted under section 380 ipc after insufficient evidence under section 395 ipc. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. argument for probation based on age and clean antecedents. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's direction for probation instead of imprisonment. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
Sibo Sankar Mishra, J.
The present Criminal Appeal, filed by the appellants under Section 374 of the Cr. P.C., is directed against the judgment and order dated 30.09.1991 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kendrapara in S.T Case No.327 of 1990/ 6 of 1991, whereby the learned trial Court has convicted the accused-appellants for the offences punishable under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (herein after ‘IPC’ for brevity) and, accordingly, sentenced them to undergo R.I. for one year each.
2. The prosecution case tersely stated is that, the criminal law was set in motion on the written report of one, Asok Kumar Pradhan. In the written report, it was alleged that while the informant and his wife were sleeping in their house at village Mulagain at about 12:30AM on 1.05.1990, the accused persons (Total 12 number of accused persons out of which only Serial No.7 and 10 are convicted, who ha
The court upheld the conviction under Section 380 IPC while emphasizing the applicability of probation for older appellants with clean antecedents.
The court held that under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, first-time offenders guilty of lesser crimes may be granted probation, taking into account their conduct post-offense.
The Court emphasized the reformative purpose of the Probation of Offenders Act, allowing convicted individuals to benefit from probation over imprisonment due to the long delay in proceedings and lac....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the accused-appellants to the benefit under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, despite being convicted under Sec....
In cases of minor offenses with no criminal antecedents, courts may prioritize rehabilitation over punishment and grant probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, especially when significant tim....
The court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC but granted probation, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment for offenders above 21 years.
The court can extend probation benefits to offenders above 21 years under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The court affirmed convictions for offenses related to obscene acts and outraging modesty while granting probation based on the absence of prior offenses and reformative principles underlining the Pr....
Courts mandatorily consider probation for eligible offences under three years' imprisonment, recording reasons for denial; long pendency, no antecedents justify reformatory release over punishment.
The need for conclusive evidence in criminal conviction is paramount, and rehabilitative measures may be preferable for lesser offenses.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
