SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 444

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
NAND PRABHA SHUKLA
Nannu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.B.L. Gaur, Onkar Nath
For the Respondent: A.G.A.

JUDGMENT :

NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the surviving appellant No. 4 Ram Singh, Mr. Ratan Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the record.

2. This appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 17.07.1987 passed by Special Judge (E.C. Act) Etah in S.T. No. 157 of 1986 convicting and sentencing the appellant Nos. 1 to 6 under Section 147 IPC to undergo for 6 months R.I. and accused Todi Singh and Bhopal to undergo R.I. for one year u/s 323 and Nannu Singh, Yad Ram, Ram Singh and Kundan Singh to undergo for a period of 1 year R.I. under Section 323/149 accused Yad Ram, to undergo for 3 years R.I. under Section 325 and accused Nannu Singh, Todi Singh, Ram Singh, Bhopal and Kundan Singh to undergo for a period of three years R.I. under read with Section 149 and accused Nanu Singh to undergo for a period of 5 years R.I. under Section 304 .

3. Today, the present Criminal Appeal is listed under the category of oldest pending cases in this High Court for priority basis.

4. The appeal against the appellant No. 1 Nannu Singh, appellant No. 2 Yadram, appellant No. 3 Todi, appellant No. 5 Bhopal alias Pappu and appe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top