SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 237

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
BISWANATH RATH, M.S. SAHOO, JJ.
Sangadi Sania - Appellant
Versus 
State of Odisha - Respondent
JCRLA No. 34 of 2005
Decided on : 02-08-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ambika Prasad Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Prem Pattanaik, AGA

Conviction modified from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to inconsistencies in witness testimonies and insufficient evidence linking the accused to the weapon used in the crime.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 and 304 - Culpable homicide - Accused convicted for murder initially, later modified to culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Inadequate proof of the weapon as the cause of death and the absence of premeditation considered crucial - The accused acted in a moment of loss of self-control due to provocation - Evidence of witnesses contradicted, but the wife of the deceased regarded as a credible eyewitness - Resulting sentencing reflected the period of time already spent in custody. (Paras 21-22)

(B) Evidence - Evaluation of ocular evidence - Minor discrepancies in eyewitness accounts do not discredit core testimonies - The standard of assessment demands caution to distinguish culpable homicide from murder. (Paras 18-20)

(C) Appeal - Modification of conviction due to presented evidence - Court must carefully evaluate the factual matrix regarding intent, motive, and circumstances of the act. (Paras 21, 22)

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and charges against the appellant. (Para 1 , 2)
2. detailed account of the prosecution's case and incident specifics. (Para 3 , 4)
3. confirmation of evidence and trial witness list. (Para 5 , 6)
4. arguments by the defense questioning the prosecution's evidence. (Para 7 , 8)
5. court's evaluation of evidence and testimonies. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
6. distinctions between culpable homicide and murder. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 21)
7. final judgment and sentence modification. (Para 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

M.S.SAHOO, J

The appellant, in the present Jail Criminal Appeal, Sangadi Sania, is aggrieved by the judgment dated 3.4.2003 passed by the learned Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Jeypore for finding him guilty of committing offence punishable U/s.302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (in short ‘IPC’), sentencing him to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One thousand) or in default of payment to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three months after completion of Criminal Trial No.44 of 2012, arising out of G.R. Case No.451/2000, corresponding to Pottangi P.S. Case No.32 of 2000 committed by the learned S.D.J.M., Koraput.

Factual Matrix

2. The appellant was the sole accused facing trial before the learned Sessions Court. The incident alleged, occurred on 21.07.2000 at about 8.00 P.M. in village Sishaguda within the jurisdiction of Potttangi Police Station in the district of Koraput. The first information report (FIR for short) was lodged at about 9.00 P.M. on 21.07.2000 in the concerned Police Station after which the P.S. Case No. 32 of 2000 was registered by the Officer-in-charge.

2.1. The FIR was orally stated before the Officer-in-charge of the Police Station who reduced the oral statement into writing in Oriya. The informant-Gumurabali Syama (P.W.4) put his thumb impression after the contents of the F.I.R. was explained and read over to him. Translated to English the F.I.R. narrates as follows :

“I, Gumurabali Syama, son of late Gumurabali Mulia, aged about 27 years, resident of village Sishaguda, P.S. Pottangi. Dist.Koraput today on 21.07.2000, 9.00 P.M. along with my co-villager Majhi Balu having come to the Police Station, lodge the F.I.R. orally that younger brother of Songadi Sonia has married my younger sister. Earlier my brother Gumurabali Sukra had altercation (madagola) with Sonagadi Sania. Today i.e. 21.7.2000 Friday at about 8.00 P.M. in the evening my brother Sukra after having his food was at home. At that time Songadi Sania went and called my brother as “Samudhi”. Sukra listening to the call came out of house. After Sukra came out of house Sania without any further talk, stabbed Sukra with knife three to four times. My brother Sukra shouted Pesi Sania stabbed with knife. Me and Majhi Balu listening his call came out. While trying to hold Sukra, he felled down, intestine came out, he died at the said spot. Sania went away and hid him somewhere. Hearing the shout, persons from our Sahi came and saw that my brother in front of his house, where he was stabbed, was lying dead. He had bleeding injuries at chest and stomach. His intestines came out. The writing has been made as per my statement which was heard by me read by the Babu. The same being correct, I put my thumb impression.

3. We heard the detailed arguments of Mr.Ambika Prasad Mishra, learned Legal Aid counsel for the appellant and Mr. Prem Pattanaik, then functioning as a learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

Learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State have filed their written argument after exchanging copies thereof.

Prosecution Case

4. In the trial Prosecution alleged that the accused Sangadi Sania and deceased Gumuraballi Sukra had prior enmity. On 21.07.2000 at 8.00 P.M. in the night, while the deceased and his wife were in their house, the accused came there and called the deceased by saying “Samudhi- Samudhi” and when the decease

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top