SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 365

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.PATTANAIK
Nidaganti Laxmi Rajyam – Appellant
Versus
Madan Mohan Patnaik – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Mishra
For the Respondent: S.K. Rath

Table of Content
1. challenges regarding maintenance and compensation under the act. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. final order and directive regarding payment. (Para 5 , 19 , 20)
3. parties' contentions on maintenance and conduct. (Para 6 , 7)
4. legal standards for domestic relationship and entitlements. (Para 10 , 11 , 14)
5. determination of reasonable maintenance amount. (Para 15 , 16)
6. court's findings on arrear payments and medical expenses. (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

1. Both the revisions are disposed of by the following common judgment since it involves the same parties.

3. CRLREV No.211 of 2016: Present revision is at the behest of the husband assailing the decision in Criminal Appeal No.23 of 2014 of the learned court below in a proceeding initiated under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (henceforth referred to as ‘the Act’) and for having enhanced the maintenance to Rs.8000/- per month payable to the wife as against the order of the learned Nyayadhikari, Gram Nyayalaya-cum-J.M.F.C., Kolanara, Rayagada of Rs.6,000/- and also on account of compensation of Rs.3 lac awarded against him on the grounds stated therein.

5. Heard Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top