SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 649

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CHITTARANJAN DASH
Himansu Barik – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G.K. Rath
For the Respondent: Raj Bhusan Dash

Table of Content
1. factual background on the petitioner's complaint process. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments on the necessity of sanction under section 197 crpc. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's analysis of section 197 crpc and relevant case law. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. clarification of the application of section 197 in relation to public servants. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. conclusion on the necessity of sanction for prosecution. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

3. The Petitioner is actively involved in promoting social justice and routinely brings instances of illegality to the notice of the competent authorities. In one such instance, he became aware that certain children were engaged in hazardous child labour and accordingly reported the matter to the District Labour Officer (DLO), Boudh. The DLO acknowledged the information, appreciated the Petitioner’s efforts, and assured that legal action would be taken against the offenders.

When the Petitioner protested, the DLO allegedly abused him in foul language, forcibly pushed him out of the office, and continued to harass him. Aggrieved by this conduct, the Petitioner consulted counsel and filed a complaint before

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top