IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K. PATTANAIK
Alok Chandra Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Odisha Public Service Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed by petitioners against rejection of cadre proposal. (Para 1) |
| 2. history and background of the petitioners' employment and cadre claims. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments presented by petitioners and counter from opposite parties. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's evaluation of proposals and regulatory framework. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. order directing restructuring of commission's cadre. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners assailing the impugned orders as at Annexure-5, 9 & 11 for the State Govt. having rejected the proposal for introduction of a cadre of Assistant Section Officer in the establishment of the of the Odisha Public Service Commission (shortly called as ‘the Commission’), namely, opposite party No.1with grant of consequential pay and other service conditions at par with the employees serving in the corresponding grade in the Odisha Secretariat with the merger of the cadres of Junior Assistant and Senior Assistant complying Regulation 5 of the Odisha Public Service Commission (Method of Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Staff) Regulations, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Re
O.P. Bhandari Vs. Indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. & others
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. & another Vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly and another
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress & others
Sheo Narain Nagar and others Vs. State of U.P. and another
The Accountant General and another Vs. S. Doraiswamy and others
The court established that the Odisha Public Service Commission must restructure its cadre to align terms of service with the Secretariat, ensuring equal treatment under the governing regulations, ad....
Lt. Governor competent to frame recruitment rules for UT subordinate services under Article 309 proviso; cadre restructuring/abolition of posts is executive policy not amenable to judicial review abs....
The court established that the recommendations of the Justice Shetty Commission are advisory and not binding, allowing states autonomy in implementing changes to service rules while respecting consti....
The Central Government retains jurisdiction to clarify promotion criteria and integrate service personnel post-reorganization, and the lack of personal hearings does not violate established principle....
The allocation of vacancies and creation of posts in the High Court Establishment are matters of policy within the powers of the Chief Justice and are not subject to judicial review unless they viola....
The Odisha Panchayat Executive Officers Service Rules, 2021 do not violate constitutional rights and do not create vested rights for prior promotional pathways of Grama Rozgar Sevaks, affirming the S....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.