SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 810

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Rakhal Chandra Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Pratyusha Naidu
For the Respondent: J. Sahoo

Table of Content
1. refusal of registration based on civil suit pending. (Para 1 , 3)
2. grounds for refusal rely on civil suit principles. (Para 4 , 7 , 10)
3. clarification of legal principles in registration refusal. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9)
4. writ petition allowed; registration to proceed. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the order of refusal to register the deed for sale of the petitioner passed under Section 71(1) of the REGISTRATION ACT by the Sub-Registrar, Kakatpur (Opp. Party No.2) on dated 31.07.2025.

3. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition which prompted the petitioner for filing of the same is that, on dated 31.07.2025, the petitioner presented a deed for sale before the Sub-Registrar, Kakatpur (Opp. Party No.2) for selling his properties covered under the said deed for sale in favour of the Opp. Party Nos.5 to 7, but, the Sub-Registrar, Kakatpur (Opp. Party No.2) refused to register the same as per Section 71 (1) of The Indian REGISTRATION ACT , 1908 applying the provisions of Section 22-A (c) of The REGISTRATION ACT ,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top