Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C. BEHERA
Raghupati Satyanarayan – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing orders under articles 226 and 227 (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. undisputed grounds for caste entry (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. jurisdiction of additional land commissioner (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal authority can't change caste declared by the court (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. dismissal of writ petition (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the order dated 29.08.2018 (Annexure-7 series) passed by the Additional Land Commissioner, Koraput (Opposite Party No.4) in SRP No.458 of 2014.
After hearing from both the sides, the Additional Land Commissioner, Koraput(Opposite Party No.4) allowed that SRP No.458 of 2014 filed by Siba Sankar Tripathy(Opposite Party No.5 in this writ petition) as per the impugned order dated 29.08.2018 (Annexure-7 series) and held that, the caste entry of the Opposite Party No.1 of that SRP No.458 of 2014, i.e., Raghupatruni Satyanarayan in Column No.2 of the RoR vide Khata No.52 of village-Semiliguda under Semiliguda Tahasil in district of Koraput as “Kandha” is not correct, because, his correct caste is “Kapu” and directed Tahasilda
The determination of caste based on migration is unsustainable; birthright dictates caste status, necessitating a valid certificate from a competent authority for claims.
The court emphasized the necessity for fair inquiry processes and the principle of inherited social status in inter-caste marriages, ruling that the petitioner was wrongly denied Scheduled Tribe stat....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that a person with a case based on falsehood has no right to approach the Court, and knowingly producing fabricated and fraudulent documents to ....
The insistence on pre-1950 records for caste verification is contrary to established legal principles, particularly the Supreme Court's guidelines.
Caste certificate issuance must adhere to verification requirements reflecting historical residency and ancestry, as established in relevant laws, necessitating careful examination of applicants' bac....
Migrating from one state does not grant automatic Scheduled Caste benefits in another state, despite similar caste nomenclature.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a person migrating from one state to another does not carry their caste status to the migrating state, even if the same caste is recognized as....
Article 14 is not meant to perpetuate illegality and it does not envisage negative equality
The jurisdiction of the Competent Authority to issue a Caste Certificate is determined by the applicant's place of ordinary residence as of the deemed date, and a Caste Certificate issued by the appr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
