SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 39

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
K.R. MOHAPATRA, SAVITRI RATHO, JJ.
Biswajit Swain S/o Banamali Swain – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 1639 of 2025
Decided On : 16-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Amiya Kumar Mishra, Soubhagya Kumar Rath
For the Respondents: Swayambhu Mishra, Amit Kumar Nath, Subir Palit, Pravakar Behera

The court found that the Commissioner could not interfere with the appointment of a Non-Hereditary Trust Board under the Odisha Hindu Religious Endowments Act due to lack of jurisdiction.

Headnote:(A) Odisha Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 7, 8-B, and 9 - Jurisdiction of the Commissioner to interfere with orders of appointment of Non-Hereditary Trust Board - The learned Commissioner lacks jurisdiction to interfere with an appointment made under Section 27(1) of the OHRE Act, being an administrative action that has the State's approval - The court affirmed earlier decisions that asserted the necessity for proper procedure in appointing trustees (Paras 10, 12, 13, 22, and 28).

(B) Jurisdiction - A court cannot confer jurisdiction that is not available under the law - The court clarified the legal provisions concerning hereditary trustees and administrative actions of the Commissioner.

Facts of the case:
The dispute arose from the appointment of a Non-Hereditary Trust Board for a public Deity, with allegations of improper jurisdiction exercised by the Commissioner following public grievances against the Board.

Findings of Court:
The appointment of the NHT Board by the Assistant Commissioner was upheld, ruling that the learned Commissioner improperly interfered when not authorized by the Act.

Issues: The court addressed issues of jurisdiction regarding the appointment of trust boards and proper administrative action.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Commissioner’s power is limited and cannot overturn appointments made under Section 27(1) of the OHRE Act unless justified under its distinct provisions.

Result: The order by the Commissioner was set aside, restoring the control of the NHT Board over the religious institution.

Table of Content
1. presentation of grievances and appointment of trustees (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. challenge to the jurisdiction of the commissioner regarding nht board (Para 6 , 7)
3. arguments against the validity of the learned commissioner's order (Para 8)
4. discussions on the statutory powers of the learned commissioner (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. restating the authority of the learned commissioner (Para 18)
6. final ruling and directive on the nht board's management (Para 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT :

K.R. MOHAPATRA, J.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Being aggrieved by the order dated 12th September, 2024 (Annexure-17) passed by learned Commissioner of Endowments, Odisha, Bhubaneswar (for brevity ‘learned Commissioner’), this Writ Petition has been filed. The said proceeding was initiated on the basis of a representation dated 13th August, 2024 filed by Opposite Party Nos.6 to 20 pursuant to the order dated 2nd August, 2024 (Annexure-13) passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.17592 of 2024.

3. Short narration of facts necessary for adjudication of the case are as under:-

A) The villagers of Gatiroutpatana submitted a grievance petition to learned Additional Assistant Commissioner, Endowments, Cuttack (for brevity ‘learned Assistant Commissioner’) with a prayerto make arrangements for smooth management of the Endowments, Nitikanti as well as festivals of Maa Hastibahini Thakurani, Bije at Gatiroutpatana in the district of /Cuttack (for brevity ‘the Deity’). The Deity is public in nature being worshiped by the villagers. It has Ac.3.50 acres of immovable properties. The Sevayats are possessing the immovable properties of the Deity and performing the Nitikanti.

B) Recently, the Sebayats started construction of permanent structures over the immovable properties of the Deity without taking permission of the learned Commissioner. Thus, the villagers submitted the aforesaid grievance petition. Receiving such grievance petition, the learned Assistant Commissioner, vide his Order No.865 dated 7th July, 2022 (Annexure-2), directed the Inspector of Endowments, Jagatsinghpur to visit the spot and submit a detailed report to take further action in the matter.

C) In obedience to such direction, the Inspector of Endowments visited the spot and made enquiry. He submitted his report vide letter No.192/IEC dated 2nd September, 2023 (Annexure- 3) intimating that though the nature of the Deity has not been decided judicially but the people of the locality and the villagers are visiting the temple and worshiping the Deity regularly. It was also stated that the Deity was not indexed and learned Commissioner was intimated to take steps in that regard. He further reported that some houses are being constructed over the immovable properties of the Deity. On being asked, the public present during the enquiry stated that the Marfatdars are trying to demolish the temple without prior permission of the learned Commission. Hence, the Inspector of Endowmentsrequested the learned Assistant Commissioner to take necessary steps in that regard.

D) Subsequently, the Deity was indexed vide Index No.81-HC by learned Commissioner and it was treated as a religious institution without any hereditary trustee. Accordingly, learned Assistant Commissioner directed the Inspector of Endowments, Jagatsinghpur to make an enquiry and suggest names for appointment of a Non- Hereditary Trust Board (for brevity ‘NHT Board’). In obedience to such direction, the Inspector of Endowments, vide his Notice No.233 dated 9th October, 2023 (Annexure-4) intimated the public to convene a meeting in the premises of the temple of the Deity on 12th October, 2023 to take steps for appointment of NHT Board.

E) After enquiry, the Inspector of Endowments suggested nine names for NHT Board vide his letter No.243 dated 16th October, 2023 (Annexure-5 series). Thereafter, the learned Assistant Commissioner directed the Inspector of Endowments to publish notice inviting objection in accordance with S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top