Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K.PANIGRAHI
P. Vivek – Appellant
Versus
CMD & CEO, Indian Bank, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for refund based on alleged unauthorized bank transactions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner argues unauthorized transfer and failure to refund. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court analysis of disputed facts and legal implications. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's restraint due to overlapping criminal proceedings. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. writ petition disposal, allowing for alternative remedies. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
SANJEEB K. PANIGRAHI, J.
1. The petitioner, in the present Writ Petition, seeks issuance of appropriate directions to the opposite parties for refund of an amount of Rs. 20 lakhs allegedly debited from its cash credit account maintained with Indian Bank, along with interest.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:
2. Succinctly put, the facts of the case as narrated by the petitioner are as follows:
(i) The petitioner had availed a Cash Credit (OCC) limit of Rs. 89 lakhs and a term loan of Rs. 60.00 lakhs from Indian Bank, Main Branch, 32, Ashok Nagar, Bhubaneswar, on security of land and building valued at Rs. 94.84 lakhs and a residential plot valued at Rs. 150.00 lakhs, pursuant to a sanction letter dated 09.04.2009. The said account was reviewed annu
Writ jurisdiction should not entertain disputes involving contested facts, especially where there are ongoing criminal proceedings related to the same transactions.
The court established that disciplinary actions must be based on timely and substantiated allegations, and that intent to commit wrongdoing is essential for establishing misconduct in employment-rela....
The disciplinary action was modified due to unsubstantiated allegations, emphasizing that personal financial transactions do not constitute misconduct unless violating conduct regulations.
Limited Liability of a Customer - Unauthorized aforesaid banking transactions in the bank account of petitioner as per Clause VI of the aforequoted policy of R.B.I., petitioner is entitled to zero li....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
